CERCLA Actions and Statute of Limitations: Navigating the Circuit Split, Lessons From Recent Decisions

Practical Implications for Whether Judicially Approved Settlement Requires Resolution of CERCLA Liability

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A

Conducted on Thursday, February 2, 2017

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926
Program Materials

This CLE webinar will provide guidance to counsel on the application of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) statute of limitations and when settlements trigger the statute. The panel will examine recent decisions and the circuit split, as well as offer best practices for managing timing issues in Superfund and environmental litigation.


CERCLA is an evolving area of law and how the courts interpret it varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Plaintiffs and defendants must navigate a growing and conflicting body of law regarding the statute of limitations.

The Second Circuit held a judicially approved settlement of environmental liabilities does not trigger the statute of limitations on a CERCLA contribution claim. In the Third Circuit, a judicially approved settlement of state law claims can give rise to a CERCLA contribution action, and thereby trigger the three-year statute of limitations on that claim.

The Ninth Circuit discussed the statute of limitations issue in Whittaker Corp. v. United States (June 13, 2016) and is expected to weigh in on the issue in Asarco L.L.C. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., where Asarco is appealing the district court decision, which followed the Third Circuit’s broader view and concluded Asarco waited too long to bring its CERCLA contribution claim against Atlantic Richfield.

Many federal circuit courts have not addressed the issue of when settlements trigger the statute of limitations for CERCLA actions. Environmental counsel must understand this issue or face statute of limitations challenges.

Listen as our authoritative panel of environmental attorneys examines the circuit split on the issue of the statute of limitations for CERCLA actions. The panel will discuss the two private rights of action under CERCLA and the practical implications of how the courts are ruling. The panel will also offer best practices for addressing the issue and avoiding statute of limitations problems.



  1. CERCLA actions and statute of limitations
    1. Contribution
    2. Cost recovery
  2. Circuit split on the statute of limitations and its implications
  3. Best practices for addressing the issues and avoiding statute of limitations issues


The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How are the federal courts addressing the issue of when settlement triggers the statute of limitations?
  • What factors should counsel consider when deciding when to file a contribution claim?
  • What best practices can counsel employ to reduce CERCLA liability early in the litigation?


Knowlton, Leah J.
Leah J. Knowlton

Taylor English Duma

Ms. Knowlton has more than 25 years of experience counseling clients on environmental regulatory matters and...  |  Read More

Summer Nastich
Summer Nastich

Nastich Law

Ms. Nastich specializes in environmental, construction, and land use law, including any necessary litigation. Her...  |  Read More

Christopher (Smitty) Smith, Esq.
Christopher (Smitty) Smith, Esq.

Steptoe & Johnson

Mr. Smith practices regulatory compliance and litigation as it relates to environmental matters. He concentrates on...  |  Read More

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video