Asserting Attorney-Client Privilege When Affiliated Entities' Interests Diverge
Navigating the Complexities of Joint Representation During Litigation, Spinoffs, Acquisitions or Insolvency
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
Conducted on Tuesday, April 19, 2016
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will guide corporate counsel in addressing attorney-client privilege challenges that arise when the common interests of corporations and their affiliates or subsidiaries diverge, focusing specifically on best practices for preserving the privilege and structuring privileged communications. The panel will identify potential joint representation pitfalls and discuss tips to avoid or navigate waiver of privilege issues when they occur.
An attorney for a parent corporation generally advises its subsidiaries or affiliates as well. The primary concern for counsel is whether and how attorney-client privilege can be asserted when the affiliated entities’ interests become adverse for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, litigation between or involving the parent and subsidiary, inorganic growth of one of the entities, or initiation of bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings. How should counsel approach joint representation in the event of a conflict of interest? If counsel proceeds with joint representation, how should that representation be defined? When is separate counsel necessary?
Further, inorganic growth, including, but not limited to, spin-offs, mergers or acquisitions, presents unique challenges to counsel representing new or divested corporate entities, both through the pendency of the deal transaction and post-closing. In order to avoid the additional cost of production and risk of privilege waiver, counsel needs to consider when and how to contractually transfer privilege rights or how to effectively negotiate provisions around pre-merger client communications.
Listen as our authoritative panel discusses best practices for navigating and resolving attorney-client privilege issues that arise when the common interests of parent corporations and their affiliates or subsidiaries become adverse.
- Principles governing privilege and confidentiality in joint representation of affiliated companies
- Attorney-client privilege in joint representation of affiliated companies – latest case developments
- Best practices for preserving privilege when interests diverge
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- What situations typically cause a parent corporation’s interests to diverge from the interests of its affiliates or subsidiaries?
- What are the scenarios in which attorney-client privilege may be challenged, and how can counsel minimize risk of privilege waiver in these instances?
- What are some best practices for corporate counsel to preserve the privilege when the interests of corporate affiliates or subsidiaries diverge from those of the parent?
Charles C. Lemley, Partner
Mr. Lemley represents clients in a variety of civil litigation matters, primarily focused on professional liability coverage and malpractice litigation in federal and state courts. He has significant experience representing clients in commercial, insurance coverage, aviation, and regulatory disputes.
Richard A. Simpson, Partner
Mr. Simpson has a national trial court and appellate litigation practice, with an emphasis on defense of lawyers and other professionals in malpractice and disciplinary cases and defense of insurers in insurance coverage/“bad faith” cases. He also represents clients in commercial litigation, in connection with criminal investigations, and in a wide variety of pro bono matters. He has represented clients in matters pending in 47 states.
Nicole Audet Richardson
Ms. Richardson represents professional liability and general liability insurers in connection with coverage issues and litigation matters before the federal and state courts nationwide. She serves as monitoring counsel in connection with various types of professional liability policies.
On-Demand CLE - Streaming Video
Includes recorded streaming video of full program plus PDF handouts.
On-demand is the only recorded format recognized for CLE credits in DE, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WI.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.
**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.
On-Demand CLE Video $297.00
Includes full event recording plus handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in most states.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NM, NY, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording.
Additional copies of a recording can be purchased at a discount. Please call Strafford Customer Service toll-free at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10 or email email@example.com to place your order.
Recorded Webinar Download $297.00
Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Strafford webinars offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
Many states grant CLE credits for on-demand streaming audio programs and recorded events. Our programs are pre-approved in many states. Refer to our state CLE map for state-specific information.
The program had good speakers and was an appropriate length of time.
Douglas Van Valkenburg
I found it helpful to hear the information and perspectives of all the presenters.
Mary Grace Folwell
I appreciated the discussion about the often complex aspects of giving legal opinions in the LLC context.
Stites & Harbison
I liked the practicality and thoroughness of the presentation and the handouts.
Excellent topics, discussed very well.
Corporate Law Advisory Board
Stuart M. Altman
Director, Corporate Legal Investigations
Foley & Lardner
Jenner & Block
Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.