Using Broadest Reasonable Interpretation to Your Advantage in Patent Prosecution

Establishing Scope of Claims, Avoiding Sect. 112(f), Preserving Enforceability

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A


Conducted on Thursday, September 27, 2018

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926
Program Materials

This CLE webinar will guide patent prosecution under the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) standard. The panel will provide practical lessons for using BRI to your advantage in prosecution by examining recent Federal Circuit and USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions.

Description

Patent examiners often interpret claims more broadly than is reasonable to practitioners, but they lack tools to fight the interpretation. However, PTAB and Federal Circuit cases show limits to examiners’ use of BRI in patent prosecution. The rulings underscore the importance of making focused arguments highlighting the ordinary and customary meaning of claim terms consistent with the specification and drawings.

In In re Smith International Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2017), the Federal Circuit addressed how far the Patent Office may go when applying the BRI. The court concluded the PTAB’s construction was unreasonably broad, finding that “[e]ven when giving claim terms their broadest reasonable interpretation, the Board cannot construe the claims ‘so broadly that its constructions are unreasonable under general claim construction principles.’” The court provided guidance on the proper inquiry for using BRI.

This case and others show how patentees and their counsel should focus on the plain and ordinary meaning of claim terms against the patent specification.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys examines the BRI standard and how it is being applied. The panel will also discuss the recent Federal Circuit decisions and offer practice tips for claim drafting.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. BRI standard and its application
  2. PTAB and Federal Circuit decisions
  3. Practice tips for claim drafting

Benefits

The panel will review these and other high priority issues:

  • What guidance do Federal Circuit and PTAB decisions give patent counsel on the application of BRI?
  • What arguments are useful in overcoming patent examiners’ unreasonable claim interpretations?
  • Why is defining claim terms in the specification and using the definitions critical?
  • How can patent counsel distinguish cases where extrinsic evidence has been used to supplement the specification? If and when should extrinsic evidence be used?

Faculty

Francis, Christopher
Christopher Francis

Partner
Bejin Bieneman

Mr. Francis specializes in preparing and prosecuting U.S. and foreign patent applications as well as counseling clients...  |  Read More

Hegner, Daniel
Daniel Hegner

Partner
Bejin Bieneman

Mr. Hegner is an IP attorney specializing in preparing and prosecuting U.S. and foreign patent applications in the...  |  Read More

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

$297

Download

$297