Section 102 Prior Art and Section 103 Obviousness: Leveraging CCPA and Early Federal Circuit Decisions

Withstanding Rejections and Attacks on Patent Validity and Patentability

A live 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with interactive Q&A


Thursday, January 7, 2021

1:00pm-2:30pm EST, 10:00am-11:30am PST

Early Registration Discount Deadline, Friday, December 4, 2020

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will guide patent counsel on leveraging decisions by the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA) and the Federal Circuit in applying Sections 102 and 103 prior art and obviousness standards. The panel will examine lessons learned through CCPA and early Federal Circuit decisions, as well as offer strategies for evaluating prior art and obviousness, handling evidence, and overcoming assertions of unpatentability.

Description

Recent Federal Circuit patent decisions demonstrate that some of the lessons from earlier Section 102 and 103 patent decisions by the CCPA may have fallen by the wayside. The CCPA developed a rich body of jurisprudence, which the Federal Circuit adopted as binding precedent. CCPA Section 102 and 103 jurisprudence provides a treasure trove of arguments for practitioners prosecuting and litigating patents in the face of assertions of unpatentability during ex parte prosecution and AIA's post-grant proceedings involving the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), as well as invalidity in the district courts and the International Trade Commission.

In assessing and determining anticipation and obviousness, the CCPA clarifies that all relevant evidence must be considered. Counsel can draw on CCPA cases for guidance in handling evidence and overcoming the negative effects of contemporary Federal Circuit decisions. The CCPA and early Federal Circuit decisions also give detailed guidance in assessing whether the USPTO or a patent challenger has established a proper prima facie case of obviousness.

Patent counsel must understand and heed the lessons of these cases: (1) to avoid missteps, (2) to challenge, when appropriate, a prima facie case of obviousness, and (3) to base obviousness decisions on all available evidence. That evidence may show there is no prima facie case of obviousness and/or that any such case is rebutted.

Similarly, patent counsel must understand the current state of the law and the lessons from the CCPA on anticipation and obviousness. This will impact prosecution, litigation, and proceedings before the PTAB.

Listen as our authoritative panel of U.S. patent attorneys discusses how practitioners should analyze anticipation and obviousness, examining the lessons provided by selected CCPA and early Federal Circuit decisions. The panel will offer tactics to apply those CCPA and early Federal Circuit decisions to avoid remaking old mistakes.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Assessing prior art
  2. Evaluating anticipation
  3. Evaluating obviousness
  4. Lessons from the CCPA and early Federal Circuit decisions
  5. Leveraging CCPA decisions and early Federal Circuit decisions to avoid untoward Sections 102 and 103 results

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How is evidence of unexpected properties by a claimed invention evaluated?
  • What lessons can patent counsel draw from CCPA decisions when asessing prior art? When applying the statutory obviousness standard?
  • What steps should patent counsel take going forward to avoid making the mistakes of the past?

Faculty

Bhattacharyya, Arpita
Arpita Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.

Attorney
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Ms. Bhattacharyya, Ph.D., practices all aspects of patent law, including district court and ITC litigation, patent...  |  Read More

Carrano, Aliza
Aliza G. Carrano

Partner
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Ms. Carrano is a registered patent attorney, focusing her practice on complex patent litigation before the U.S....  |  Read More

Irving, Thomas
Thomas L. Irving

Partner
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Mr. Irving has 35 years of experience in the field of IP law. His practice includes due diligence, patent prosecution,...  |  Read More

Weingarten, M. David
M. David Weingarten, Ph.D.

Partner
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Dr. Weingarten has a diverse intellectual property practice focusing on patent litigation before U.S. district courts...  |  Read More

Live Webinar

Buy Live Webinar
Early Discount (through 12/04/20)

Live Webinar

$297

Buy Live Webinar & Recording
Includes special savings of $300 (through 12/04/20)

Live Webinar & Download

$394

Live Webinar & DVD

$394 + $24.45 S&H

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Early Discount (through 12/04/20)

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

48 hours after event

$297

Download

48 hours after event

$297

DVD

10 business days after event

$297 + $24.45 S&H