Rule 506(b) Securities Offerings: Leveraging 506(b) Placements, Comparison to Rule 506(c) Offerings

Navigating Rules for Solicitation and Accreditation Process for Non-Accredited Investors

Recording of a 90-minute CLE/CPE webinar with Q&A


Conducted on Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926
Program Materials

This CLE webinar will compare and contrast four types of private securities offerings under SEC Rule 506 utilizing different types of solicitation tools:

  • Rule 506(b) without using a technology platform to communicate the offering to investors
  • Rule 506(b) using a technology platform to communicate the offering to investors
  • Rule 506 (c) using a technology platform
  • Rule 506 (c) using social media or other forms of general solicitations

The webinar will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of 506(b) offerings, with particular focus on issues of solicitation and recent SEC guidance and no-action letters.  The program will address the issues raised by including non-accredited investors in the offering, and authenticating the status of accredited investors.

Description

Rule 506(b) offerings differ in some respects from 506(c) offerings. While 506(b) offerings provides a bit more flexibility than 506(c) offerings, issuers face the drawback of not being able to find investors via the internet. However, recent SEC action letters have provided on-line portals some comfort with respect to internet solicitation.

The SEC’s 1997 Lamp Technology no action letter that allowed registered brokers ot us technology platforms to sell to “pre-qualified” investors, 2013 no-action letters to FundersClub and AngelList allowed an online platform that registered a user with a name and email address to show investments to that user. The SEC’s more recent no-action letter to Citizen VC addressed the issues of establishment of substantive relationships with unknown potential investors and what constitutes “general solicitation".

While a Rule 506(b) offering may include up to 35 non-accredited investors, issuers must consider carefully whether this strategy is practical given the onerous and costly disclosure information required for non-accredited investors as well as the burden on the issuer to show that the non-accredited investor met the “knowledge and experience” standard in 506(b)(2)(ii).

Listen as our panel of experienced securities practitioners analyzes Rule 506(b) securities offerings, discusses the benefits and drawbacks of 506(b) offerings, and compares and contrasts to 506(c) offerings. The panel will look at the issues of solicitation and recent SEC guidance and no-action letters as well as the inclusion of non-accredited investors and authenticating the status of accredited investors.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Distinction between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c)
    1. Benefits and drawbacks of 506(b) offerings
    2. Use of general solicitation and advertising
    3. Marketing to unaccredited investors
    4. Determining whether an investor meets the accredited investor definition
  2. Defining "general solicitation" and use of 506(b) by technology platforms
  3. Inclusion of non-accredited investors in a 506(b) offering
  4. Using special purpose vehicles (SPVs) to syndicate offerings

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • When may a 506(b) offering be more suited than a 506(c) offering?
  • What guidance does the SEC’s 2015 Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) provide on establishing “preexisting” and “substantive” relationships?
  • How does the accreditation process differ between 506(b) and 506(c) offerings?

Faculty

Matthew A. Cordell
Matthew A. Cordell

Atty
Ward and Smith

Mr. Cordell's practice encompasses a broad spectrum of business and regulatory matters, with a particular emphasis...  |  Read More

Knox Proctor
Knox Proctor

Atty
Ward and Smith

Mr. Proctor counsels financial institutions with corporate and regulatory matters, securities reporting, and mergers...  |  Read More

Verdonik, James
James F. Verdonik

Atty
Ward and Smith

Mr. Verdonik is leader of his firm's Securities Practice Group. His practice focuses on corporate and...  |  Read More

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

$297

Download

$297