Responding to Patent Demand Letters: Leveraging State Laws on Bad Faith Assertion of Patents

Determining What to Include or Exclude in Response, Minimizing Risk of Litigation

Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Thursday, March 2, 2017

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926
Course Materials

This CLE course will provide guidance to patent counsel for responding to demand letters. The panel will discuss legal and strategic considerations, as well as current and proposed state laws addressing bad faith assertion claims. The panel will also discuss what to include or exclude in the response to avoid creating potential harm in future litigation.


Patent disputes often start with the patent holder sending a demand letter to the alleged infringer. The best way to respond to demand letters, especially those from nonpracticing entities (NPEs), remains a challenge for many companies. After receiving a demand letter, the recipient should act to minimize or remove the risk to its business.

Recent state actions addressing bad faith assertions should also be considered. In the last two years, states have stepped in to fill a void left by Congress regarding bad faith patent assertions.

Over half the states have now passed laws to limit abusive practices by putting restrictions on patent demand letters. States have taken a variety of approaches to tackle the issue of bad faith patent assertions.

Responding to demand letters involves strategic decision-making, including factors such the patent owner’s proclivity for litigation, the relationship with the patent owner, the strength of the allegations, and what is being demanded by the patent owner.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys examines how patent counsel should proceed upon receipt of a demand letter, including a discussion of legal and strategic considerations. The panel will also discuss current and proposed state laws, offer guidance on responding to patent demand letters, and outline navigating the new state laws.



  1. Considerations in determining whether to respond to the demand letter
    1. Legal
    2. Strategic
  2. State laws regarding bad faith assertion of patents
  3. Responding to patent demand letters


The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What are the key considerations for patent counsel when evaluating whether and how to respond to patent demand letters?
  • What is the effect of state laws on bad faith assertion claims on the response to a demand letter?
  • What are some of the pitfalls patent counsel confront in responding to demand letters—and how can they be avoided?


Sharon A. Israel
Sharon A. Israel

Mayer Brown

Ms. Israel focuses her practice on intellectual property law with an emphasis in patent litigation, opinion work and...  |  Read More

Brian R. Iverson
Brian R. Iverson

Bass Berry & Sims

Mr. Iverson concentrates his practice in complex commercial litigation matters, including intellectual property...  |  Read More

Baldassare Vinti
Baldassare Vinti

Proskauer Rose

Mr. Vinti’s practice focuses on litigating patent, false advertising, trade secret, trademark and contractual...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video