Coming soon! Strafford will move to BARBRI Professional Education >

Recovered Memory Experts and FRE 702 Gatekeeping: Evaluating Whether Good Grounds Support Expert Testimony

A live 90-minute CLE video webinar with interactive Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Thursday, September 11, 2025

1:00pm-2:30pm EDT, 10:00am-11:30am PDT

or call 1-800-926-7926
Add to your calendar

This CLE webinar will discuss expert evidence related to "repressed" or "recovered" memories in sexual abuse litigation, specifically focusing on admissibility contests under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, Daubert, and parallel state rules. The discussion will include Cohen v. Cohen, 125 F.4th 454 (3d Cir. 2025), which offers the first in-depth circuit court analysis of repressed memory theory under FRE 702 and provides detailed guidance on how opinions of any experts regardless of subject matter ought to be analyzed before being admitted into evidence.

Description

It is no longer unusual for abuse claims to be lodged long after the alleged acts occurred. Although many states have lengthened or temporarily reopened the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse, it is still not unusual for plaintiffs to assert claims based on alleged "recovered" or "repressed" memories. This theory has been particularly controversial because of the possibility of counselors creating false memories.

The stakes in these kinds of cases are extremely high, with no margin for error. Attorneys bringing or defending abuse cases grounded in recovered memories—which may not be limited to sexual abuse—need to understand this exceedingly difficult and complicated subject in detail.

In Cohen v. Cohen, the Third Circuit was confronted with a childhood sexual abuse case based on recovered memories. It reviewed how the district court should have analyzed the admissibility of the plaintiff's expert's opinion, specifically focusing on the requirements of FRE 702 and what happens when both sides present expert testimony. Cohen offers an in-depth analysis of the "recovered" memory theory and its experts, but more significantly sheds light on the nuances of FRE 702 and dueling experts that can be applied in any type of case.

Listen as this distinguished panel discusses expert evidence related to "repressed" or "recovered" memories and the lessons from Cohen that are applicable to any case involving experts and especially dueling experts.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Repressed memory theory
  2. Applying FRE 702 analysis to repressed memory theory
  3. Lessons from Cohen

Benefits

The panel will review these and other important questions:

  • Is it repression or recovery of memories that is more controversial?
  • What is an individualized Daubert analysis?
  • How should courts assess studies under Rule 702?

Faculty

DeGroote, Kiersty
Kiersty DeGroote
Attorney
Bochetto/Lentz

Ms. DeGroote's practice focuses on complex matters related to personal injury, employment law, and general...  |  Read More

Attend on September 11

Cannot Attend September 11?

You may pre-order a recording to listen at your convenience. Recordings are available 48 hours after the webinar. Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

BARBRI | Strafford

Strafford is Now Part of BARBRI for Professionals!

The same expert-led professional development courses you know and love from Strafford are now part of BARBRI, the trusted global leader in legal education.

Please note that the Strafford website will soon be archived. All programming, account details, and certificates will soon be migrating to our new site at barbri.com/professional-development.

All customers will be notified once this migration has been completed.