Pleading Requirements for Patent Infringement Amid Inconsistent Court Treatment

Applying Federal Circuit Factors, Understanding the Right Amount to Plead

A live 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with interactive Q&A


Tuesday, October 12, 2021

1:00pm-2:30pm EDT, 10:00am-11:30am PDT

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE course will guide patent counsel on the pleading requirements in patent infringement cases. The panel will discuss what is the right amount when pleading patent infringement cases. The panel will discuss how the courts have addressed the issue and offer best practices for meeting the pleading requirements.

Description

Since the Judicial Conference of the United States and the Supreme Court eliminated Form 18 in December 2015, it is not enough to plead that a defendant makes, uses, or sells products that practice a patented invention to meet the pleading standards. The federal district courts now assess patent infringement complaints about their sufficiency under the plausibility standard articulated in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (U.S. 2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (U.S. 2009).

However, the courts are applying the standards differently. Consequently, pleading standards now vary, even among judges in the same district. The Federal Circuit recently addressed pleading requirements and provided some guidance in its decision in the Bot M8 v. Sony case (July 2021). Patent litigators should know how courts in which their cases are filed have applied the standard and draft their complaints accordingly.

In Bot M8, the court reiterated that "[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice." The court stated that a plaintiff need not "prove its case at the pleadings stage," nor must it plead infringement on an element-by-element basis. The court held it is sufficient if "a complaint place the alleged infringer on notice of what activity ... is being accused of infringement." The court also provided several factors that would impact the level of detail required for a complaint.

Listen as our authoritative panel of IP attorneys examines the pleading requirements in patent infringement cases and what is the right amount when pleading patent infringement cases. The panel will discuss how the courts have addressed the issue and best practices for meeting the pleading requirements.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Pleading requirements for patent infringement claims
  2. Court treatment
  3. Federal Circuit factors
  4. Best practices for meeting the pleading requirements

Benefits

The panel will review these and other important questions:

  • How have the courts treated the issue of pleading requirements since the abrogation of Form 18?
  • What factors articulated by the Federal Circuit need to be considered when drafting a patent infringement complaint?
  • What strategies should litigators apply to meet the pleading requirements?

Faculty

Bruno, Christopher
Christopher M. Bruno

Partner
McDermott Will & Emery

Mr. Bruno focuses his practice on intellectual property litigation matters, primarily involving trade secrets,...  |  Read More

Saltiel, Joseph
Joseph A. Saltiel

Attorney
Irwin IP

Mr. Saltiel is an IP litigator with a long track record of successfully representing clients in court. He has litigated...  |  Read More

Attend on October 12

Cannot Attend October 12?

You may pre-order a recording to listen at your convenience. Recordings are available 48 hours after the webinar. Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

Download