Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Limiting NEPA: Practice Implications of the Seven County Decision

EIS Project Review, Litigation Strategy, and Regulatory Risk

A live 90-minute CLE video webinar with interactive Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

1:00pm-2:30pm EDT, 10:00am-11:30am PDT

Early Registration Discount Deadline, Friday, July 11, 2025

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will examine the recent Supreme Court decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, in which the Court clarified the threshold for meeting NEPA requirements, emphasizing the scope of review and standard for agency deference.

Description

The decision is expected to have a wide-ranging effect on infrastructure, energy, and property projects, resetting regulatory review expectations and impacting oversight processes, permitting timelines, and client risk assessments.

The Court held that NEPA does not require "upstream" or "downstream" review of project environmental impacts and reiterated the Court's position giving "substantial deference" to agency conclusions. Experts expect future reviewing courts to consider an agency’s EIS analysis within "a broad zone of reasonableness," considering only the "project at hand" without factoring projects or actions "separate in time or place."

Listen as the expert panel reviews Seven County and related precedents from Loper Bright, Chevron, Public Citizen, and more covering the takeaways and practice implications for clients and future projects.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Introduction
    1. Case snapshot and holding
  2. NEPA and precedent
    1. NEPA basics
    2. Prior case law: Kleppe and Public Citizen
    3. Loper Bright and Chevron: putting deference in context
  3. Case analysis: Seven County
    1. Factual background
    2. Legal issues: up/downstream impacts, separation in time/space
    3. SCOTUS majority/dissenting opinions
  4. Practical implications
    1. Advising clients: reduced scope of review, risk mitigation strategy
    2. Strategic considerations for litigators: increased difficulty, shifting focus to agency discretion?
    3. Local government and environmental NGO perspective: new limitations, other avenues (CWA, ESA)?
  5. Industry-specific concerns
  6. Ethical considerations
  7. Future of environmental review
    1. Federal and state legislative responses
    2. State-level environmental review considerations

Benefits

The panel will review these and other important considerations:

  • Understand how Seven County could affect regulatory review and oversight processes and shorten permitting timelines
  • Gain insight into changes in project risks and how to reframe the scope of EIS work
  • Learn how best to collaborate with regulatory agencies going forward
  • Hear what adjusted "permitting strategies" will withstand future judicial scrutiny

Faculty

Brady, Andrew
Andrew J. Brady

Partner
DLA Piper

Mr. Brady, Partner in DLA Piper's Downtown Los Angeles office, represents clients in administrative processes...  |  Read More

Menard, Nathan
Nathan R. Menard

Attorney
Hunton Andrews Kurth

Mr. Menard focuses his practice at the intersection of environmental and energy law. Prior to joining Hunton,...  |  Read More

Ward, Alexandra
Alexandra E. Ward

Attorney
Holland & Knight

Ms. Ward focuses her practice on a broad range of environmental and administrative litigation, regulatory compliance...  |  Read More

Attend on July 29

Early Discount (through 07/11/25)

Cannot Attend July 29?

Early Discount (through 07/11/25)

You may pre-order a recording to listen at your convenience. Recordings are available 48 hours after the webinar. Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video