Leveraging Latest Patent Decisions, Navigating New Complexities, Cases to Watch in 2017

Key Lessons on Patent Eligibility, Deference on Appeal, Venue, Estoppel, Continuation Patent Applications, and More

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A


Conducted on Thursday, January 26, 2017
Recorded event now available


This CLE webinar will discuss the latest key federal court and PTAB decisions, provide insights into lessons from the decisions for patent counsel and their clients going forward, and offer best practices for handling patent issues in light of the developments.

Description

Patent counsel must stay up-to-date and understand the significant developments over the past year in patent cases. For example, the Supreme Court issued important decisions, ruling on the Patent Office’s approach of applying the BRI standard to interpret patent claims and addressing the standard for awarding enhanced damages. The Federal Circuit also provided important guidance on patent eligibility and reviewability of PTAB decisions.

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Nov. 2016 in two patent cases. The first is Samsung Electronics v. Apple, where the Court ruled in December that the term ‘article of manufacture’ as used in the context of design patent damages encompasses both a product sold to a consumer and a component of that product, potentially limiting some damages awards. The second case is SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products, where the Court faces a question as to the extent to which the defense of laches may bar a patent infringement claim, if at all.

The PTAB also issued precedential decisions addressing additional discovery, the one-year time bar and substitute claims, among other issues.

Listen as our panel of patent attorneys provides an analysis of the latest and most important Supreme Court, Federal Circuit and PTAB decisions in 2016. The panel will provide insight into the impact of those decisions and offer best practices for handling patent cases. The panel will also discuss the cases to watch in 2017.

Outline

  1. Key PTAB decisions
  2. Supreme Court and Federal Circuit decisions
  3. What the decisions mean for future cases
  4. Best practices in light of recent decisions
  5. What to watch for in 2017

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How was Cuozzo decision affected claim construction and reviewability?
  • How will the district courts apply the new standard for enhanced damages?
  • How are the courts applying the framework for patent eligibility created in Alice Corp.?

Faculty

Joseph E. Palys, Partner, Litigation Department
Paul Hastings, Washington, D.C.

Mr. Palys focuses his patent practice on litigation, post-grant proceedings, portfolio monetization and management, and client counseling. His technical experience is primarily in the areas of software, business methods, financial services, computer, network, and electro-mechanical technologies. Mr. Palys leans on his more than 20 years of patent experience to counsel small to very large clients regarding post-grant review proceedings implemented under the AIA, and to provide infringement, validity, and product clearance opinions.

Timothy K. Sendek, Partner
Lathrop & Gage, Chicago

Mr. Sendek is an experienced trial lawyer focusing on IP matters. He has litigated and tried patent, trademark and copyright matters in U.S. District Courts, and before the ITC and the PTAB. Mr. Sendek's practice also includes counseling and patent prosecution before the USPTO. Mr. Sendek has also taught patent litigation as an adjunct professor at the University of Illinois College of Law.


Recordings

CLE On-Demand - Streaming Video

Includes recorded streaming video of full program plus PDF handouts.

On-demand is the only recorded format recognized for CLE credits in DE, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WI.

AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)

*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.

**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.

CLE On-Demand Video $297.00

How does this work?


Recorded Event

Includes full event recording plus handouts.

Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in most states.

AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NJ, NM, NY, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording.

Additional copies of a recording can be purchased at a discount. Please call Strafford Customer Service toll-free at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10 or email customerservice@straffordpub.com to place your order.

Recorded Webinar Download $297.00

How does this work?

Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00

How does this work?

DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H

How does this work?


Webinar

Strafford webinars offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program).  Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

or call 1-800-926-7926

CLE Credits By State

See CLE State Map >

or call 1-800-926-7926

Customer Reviews

Strafford provided an enthusiastic presentation that focused on patent practice, not theory.

David H. Vance

Vance Intellectual Property

I liked the practical insights, particularly when tied to cases the presenters had worked on.

Michael Gray

Kohler

The program covered a fair amount of material in a short time period.

Dawn Sharff

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings

The speakers were very well informed and knowledgeable.

Geoffrey Peck

Morrison & Foerster

Very timely. I also liked the references to current and recent suits.

John Devlin

Lane Powell

or call 1-800-926-7926

Patent Law Advisory Board

Charles S. Baker

Partner

Fulbright & Jaworski

David S. Bloch

Partner

Winston & Strawn

Irah H. Donner

Partner

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan

Ian N. Feinberg

Partner

Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson

Anthony J. Fitzpatrick

Partner

Duane Morris

David Segal

Senior IP Counsel

Intel

Astrid R. Spain

Partner

Jones Day

Mark P. Wine

Partner

Orrick

or call 1-800-926-7926

Our Guarantee

Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.