Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Heading for the Dexit? (Re)considering Delaware Incorporation; Considering Other States

A live 90-minute CLE video webinar with interactive Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Thursday, July 17, 2025

1:00pm-2:30pm EDT, 10:00am-11:30am PDT

Early Registration Discount Deadline, Friday, June 20, 2025

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will update corporate counsel on recent changes in the DGCL, decisions from the Delaware Court of Chancery, and responsive actions by states seeking to draw corporations away from Delaware.

Description

Delaware is the legal residence for more than 2 million entities, including two-thirds of Fortune 500 companies. Delaware collects billions of dollars in revenue through corporate registration activity. In 2024, for the first time, more companies in the Russell 3000 Index left Delaware than moved to the state.

Recently, a half dozen billion-dollar corporations left Delaware for Nevada, Texas, and Indiana. Dozens more are considering proposals to move in what many are calling "Dexit" (a nod to "Brexit," the UK's departure from the EU).

Unfavorable case decisions like Tornetta v. Musk II gave pause to major corporations, heightened Delaware lawmaker anxiety, and catalyzed rapidly adopted legislation intended to strengthen corporate insider protection and shore up eroding corporate confidence. Texas and Nevada likewise seized the opportunity to tweak their own legal landscapes in a battle for the hearts and minds of corporate America.

Critics claim these changes upset decades of thoughtful Delaware legislation and jurisprudence, bringing disadvantage to common investors like pensioners and middle-class savers, while enabling billionaires and corporate insiders room to violate their fiduciary duty.

Listen as our expert panel covers the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating in Delaware, Texas, or Nevada, including discussion on the factors influencing state choice and the ethical and fiduciary implications for directors and comparative shareholders rights. Help answer the question, "Should your company join Dexit?"

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Introduction: purpose and context
  2. Why Delaware? Historical dominance, infrastructure (DGCL and Court of Chancery)
  3. Rise of Dexit and corporate migration
    1. Case catalysts: Tornetta v. Musk II
    2. Statutory catalysts: Delaware's SB21, responses in DE, TX, NV, and beyond
  4. Challenges within the Delaware framework
    1. Shifting definitions and standards
      1. Redefined terms; "controlling shareholder, "controlling stockholder transaction," etc.
      2. Evolving standards for director independence, cleansing, coverage of governance conflicts, inspection rights
      3. Standard of review for conflicting transactions - from Sinclair Oil to "entire fairness"
  5. Advantages and disadvantages to Delaware, Texas, and Nevada incorporation
    1. Strategic considerations
      1. Nature and size of the business
      2. Legal predictability or flexibility
      3. Cost and tax implications
      4. Shareholder litigation potential
      5. Investor preferences
  6. Ethical and fiduciary implications
  7. Conclusions: Will Dexit be widespread?

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • Assess the risk/reward of state incorporation decisions considering fast-moving developments (e.g., Tornetta v. Musk II, SB21, Texas corporate law changes)
  • Gain an updated view of directors' and officers' obligations, the standard of review in conflicted transactions, and how these vary dramatically by jurisdiction
  • Guidance on shareholder litigation exposure under Delaware's "entire fairness" vs. Nevada's and Texas' more lenient business judgment rules
  • Assist understanding of inspection rights and litigation triggers under different legal regimes
  • Encourages discussion of ethical implications and helps counsel provide holistic guidance to boards or clients weighing their incorporation options

Faculty

Edwards, Benjamin
Professor Benjamin Edwards

Professor of Law
William S. Boyd School of Law

Professor Edwards joined the faculty of the William S. Boyd School of Law in 2017. He researches and writes about...  |  Read More

Macey, Jonathan
Professor Jonathan R. Macey

Sam Harris Professor of Corporate Law, Corporate Finance, and Securities Law
Yale Law School

Professor Macey is Sam Harris Professor of Corporate Law, Corporate Finance, and Securities Law at Yale...  |  Read More

Attend on July 17

Early Discount (through 06/20/25)

Cannot Attend July 17?

Early Discount (through 06/20/25)

You may pre-order a recording to listen at your convenience. Recordings are available 48 hours after the webinar. Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video