E-Discovery Innovation: Cutting Costs With Relevancy Quick Peek Agreements

Strategies for Negotiating First Look Agreements in Litigation

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Course Materials


The exponential growth of information subject to discovery and the escalating costs of e-discovery are staggering. Counsel must find new and creative ways to minimize cost while not placing confidential information in jeopardy.

Relevancy quick peek agreements are a unique opportunity to reduce unnecessary expense and review. Also called first look agreements, they allow plaintiffs to review an agreed upon set of defendant data prior to production and designate what they want produced.

Rather than reviewing Gigabytes to Terabytes of irrelevant information to identify the relevant subset, defendants can review the identified documents, produce those they agree are relevant, and negotiate or move to exclude those determined irrelevant.

The new Federal Rule of Evidence 502 supports this approach, providing additional protections should inadvertent waiver of privilege occur during the relevancy quick peek review period.

Listen as our authoritative panel of litigation attorneys examines what the Federal Rules say on relevancy quick peek agreements, the implications of search terms and technology, security considerations, and best practices for drafting and using first look agreements to contain costs.



  1. Federal Rules on quick peek agreements
  2. Implications of search terms and technology
  3. Security considerations
  4. Best practices for drafting and using quick peek agreements


The panel will review these and other key questions:

  • How do the Federal Rules address quick peek agreements?
  • What are the risks associated with the agreements?
  • How have courts treated the agreements?
  • What provisions should be included in the agreements?


Julie Anne Halter
Julie Anne Halter
K&L Gates

Her practice includes general business litigation and managing large, document–intensive cases, specifically...  |  Read More

Wendy Butler Curtis
Wendy Butler Curtis
Special Counsel E-Discovery
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe

Her practice focuses on complex litigation, with an emphasis on litigation management and e-discovery. She coordinates...  |  Read More

Rand P. Nolen
Rand P. Nolen
Fleming & Associates

He practices in the areas of personal injury, products liability, commercial litigation and medical malpractice,...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Audio