Drafting and Prosecuting Patent Applications to Withstand PTAB Scrutiny

Building Reasonable Claim Construction to Avoid Unpatentability and Using Declarations to Survive Post-Grant Proceedings

A live 90-minute premium CLE webinar with interactive Q&A


Tuesday, November 19, 2019

1:00pm-2:30pm EST, 10:00am-11:30am PST

Early Registration Discount Deadline, Friday, October 25, 2019

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will provide guidance to patent counsel for drafting and prosecuting U.S. patent applications to achieve the broadest claim interpretations that avoid unpatentability and provide a basis for proving infringement. The panel will offer best practices to solidify novelty, non-obviousness, enablement, and written description positions, both for litigation and PTAB AIA post-grant proceedings.

Description

IPRs remain weighted in favor of patent challengers, and the ability to amend, not just cancel, claims in post-grant proceedings has been rare. Institution rates remain high (about two-thirds of petitions are granted) as do cancellation rates of instituted claims (According to the latest USPTO stats, in 63% of Final Written Decisions all claims were canceled). Practitioners must act during drafting and prosecution to strengthen their potentially critical patent applications against PTAB scrutiny.

The initial objective for a patent owner is to have the petition denied. A well-drafted specification and file history, possibly including declarations presented therein, provide the basis for the patent owner's preliminary response (POPR), and a means to avoid institution of an IPR or PGR entirely or possibly even to achieve a settlement.

Listen as our authoritative panel offers concrete suggestions for drafting and prosecuting U.S. patent applications to seek the broadest reasonable claim interpretation while avoiding unpatentability before the PTAB. The panel will offer best practices to solidify novelty, non-obviousness, enablement, and written description positions.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Claim drafting strategies across various fields of technology
  2. Specification drafting strategies
  3. Prosecution strategies
    1. Continuation applications
    2. Carefully prepared declarations
    3. Judicious use of patent profanity to limit reasonability of broadest claim construction, at least in certain embodiments

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How can practitioners draft and prosecute patent applications and claims to minimize the threat and/or efficacy of a third-party's post-grant challenges?
  • How can patent owners obtain broad claims to keep competitors at bay while countering attempts to render those broad claims unpatentable under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard before the PTAB?
  • How can practitioners introduce substantial grounds for patentability under Sections 102, 103, and 112 in the specification and prosecution history in the hopes that IPRs and PGRs are either denied or otherwise ineffective against the challenged instituted claims?

Faculty

Irving, Thomas
Thomas L. Irving

Partner
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Mr. Irving has 35 years of experience in the field of IP law. His practice includes due diligence, patent prosecution,...  |  Read More

Gutowski, Anthony
Anthony M. Gutowski

Partner
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Mr. Gutowski focuses on client counseling, patent procurement, and patent enforcement. He advises clients on patent...  |  Read More

Mulcahy, John
John M. Mulcahy

Partner
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Mr. Mulcahy focuses on patent litigation before both the ITC and federal district courts. His litigation experience...  |  Read More

Live Webinar

Buy Live Webinar
Includes Early Discount Savings of $50 (through 10/25/19)

Live Webinar

$297

Buy Live Webinar & Recording
Includes special savings of $300 (through 10/25/19)

Live Webinar & Download

$394

Live Webinar & DVD

$394 + $19.45 S&H

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Includes Early Discount Savings of $50 (through 10/25/19)

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

48 hours after event

$297

Download

48 hours after event

$297

DVD

10 business days after event

$297 + $19.45 S&H