Design Patent Litigation: Increasing the Probability of Success in Infringement Outcomes

Leveraging Science-Based Objective Ordinary Observer Test Surveys

Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with Q&A


Conducted on Thursday, September 9, 2021

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926
Course Materials

This CLE course will guide design patent counsel in the application of the Gorham ordinary observer test in design patent litigation. The panel will review recent design patent decisions that result in undesirable subjective outcomes. The panel will also present validated large-sample consumer surveys and discuss the use of science-based, objective Empirical Ordinary Observer Test (EOOT) survey methodology. The panel will offer actual data from the recent application of the EOOT methodology and review the Daubert challenges asserted against the EOOT methodology.

Description

The degree of subjectivity in applying the ordinary observer test in design patent litigation has become a massive problem for companies striving to protect their high-value design patent portfolios. Based on a review of recent cases, it is clear that judges and juries are delivering judgments based on subjective infringement evaluations that make little sense and produce outcomes that are creating a universe of case law that is highly unstable and unpredictable.

The persistent presence of high levels of subjective variability in design patent litigation now requires a serious move toward applying more rigorous, objective, and science-based methods, if this persistent trend is going to be reversed. It is a simple fact that how consumers process the shape of products is far more complex and subject to bias than previously thought. The finder of fact can and will benefit from science-based, objective consumer survey data that provides insights into how the actual consumer population rates product shape based on the application of the ordinary observer test. The value of design patents likely depends on more rigorous, science-based litigation and risk mitigation methods.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Recent design patent decisions that result in undesirable subjective outcomes
  2. Validated large-sample consumer surveys
    1. Use of science-based, objective EOOT survey methodology
    2. Actual data from the recent application of the EOOT methodology
    3. Daubert challenges asserted against the EOOT methodology
  3. Best practices for leveraging science-based objective ordinary observer test surveys

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How can counsel best utilize EOOT methodology surveys to increase the likelihood of success, both on summary judgment and at trial?
  • What steps should counsel take to ensure the survey is properly defined and formulated to achieve counsel's intended goal?
  • What are the best practices for practitioners to execute the survey to make sure the results are admissible?

Faculty

Mauro, Charles
Charles L. Mauro, CHFP

Founder and President
MAURO Usability Science

Mr. Mauro is a Certified Human Factors Engineering Professional BCPE. He has personally managed over 4,000 research and...  |  Read More

Morley, Chris
Chris Morley, MSc
Director of Research
MAURO Usability Science

Mr. Morley is a human factors engineer with extensive experience managing consumer product research programs involving...  |  Read More

Saidman, Perry
Perry Saidman

Of Counsel
Saidman Design Law Group

Mr. Saidman is a pioneer in the field of design law, successfully representing clients in groundbreaking cases that...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

Download