Competitor Information Sharing in Joint Ventures and Mergers: Minimizing Antitrust Risks
Avoiding Gun-Jumping and Other Restraints on Competition
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
Conducted on Tuesday, January 10, 2017
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will provide guidance to antitrust practitioners on the potential liability risks competitors face when sharing information related to a joint venture or when considering a merger. The panel will offer insights and guidance from recent court rulings and government enforcement actions.
The substance and extent of information that can be shared among competitors in the context of a merger or joint venture is an area of continuing concern for businesses. If the sharing of competitor information is not handled appropriately, companies may face antitrust liability.
Recent litigation and government actions worldwide provide lessons on the proper parameters of information sharing when a company contemplates any business relationship with a competitor. Case law also provides guidance on avoiding gun-jumping during pre-merger due diligence.
Listen as our authoritative panel of antitrust attorneys examines competitor information sharing in mergers and other competitor collaborations, traps to avoid, lessons learned, and guidance from court and agency actions. The panel will outline best practices for competitor businesses to avoid violating antitrust laws and regulations.
- Information sharing in the pre-merger context: avoiding gun-jumping
- Specific applications during due diligence and transition planning; joint marketing; transaction documentation; meetings of executives
- Guidelines and best practices
- Information sharing among competitors
- Overview of applicable law
- Risks of competitive information exchanges
- Specific applications: benchmarking, trade associations and standard setting
- Guidelines and best practices
- Learning from recent developments at the antitrust agencies and from private litigation
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- What are the key activities that merging parties and competitive collaborators should avoid?
- What guidance do recent court decisions provide for competitor joint ventures?
- What safeguards should companies implement to prevent sharing information that will violate antitrust law?
Karen Kazmerzak, Partner
Ms. Kazmerzak, a former FTC attorney, has a broad practice counseling clients regarding antitrust matters involved in M&As and concerning antitrust issues in licensing, distribution, pricing, and competitor collaborations. She represents clients seeking merger clearance from the FTC and the U.S. DOJ, and clients that are third-party market participants subpoenaed by the government or that oppose an acquisition. Ms. Kazmerzakalso works closely with co-counsel and economists to develop the best global strategy for clients’ advocacy across several jurisdictions, including in the U.S.
Mary Lehner, Partner
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer,
Ms. Lehner focuses on representing clients before the U.S. DOJ, the FTC and the state attorneys general on the antitrust aspects of M&As, joint ventures, distribution and IP arrangements, and other competitive conduct. She is a former advisor to two FTC chairmen, providing counsel on antitrust investigations, enforcement actions, domestic and international policy initiatives, public relations and congressional strategies. Prior to her post in the chairman’s office, Ms. Lehner oversaw antitrust merger investigations as a lead attorney in the FTC’s Bureau of Competition.
Meghan Rissmiller, Partner
Ms. Rissmiller focuses on antitrust litigation, merger clearance, and non-merger antitrust investigations. She additionally has experience in consumer protection litigation and investigations. She also provides counseling for clients on a range of antitrust issues, including joint ventures, exclusivity, resale price maintenance, benchmarking, and antitrust compliance.
CLE On-Demand - Streaming Video
Includes recorded streaming video of full program plus PDF handouts.
On-demand is the only recorded format recognized for CLE credits in DE, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WI.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.
**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.
CLE On-Demand Video $297.00
Includes full event recording plus handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in most states.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NJ, NM, NY, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording.
Additional copies of a recording can be purchased at a discount. Please call Strafford Customer Service toll-free at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10 or email email@example.com to place your order.
Recorded Webinar Download $297.00
Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Strafford webinars offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
Many states grant CLE credits for on-demand streaming audio programs and recorded events. Our programs are pre-approved in many states. Refer to our state CLE map for state-specific information.
Very good. Gave me exactly what I wanted. The questions I emailed in were handled thoroughly.
James J. Long
Briggs & Morgan
Content was excellent.
The scope of the program provided in-depth information, as opposed to a general survey of issues/topics.
Wolff & Samson
Very practical and useful advice for antitrust lawyers.
Hogan Lovells US
One of the best webinars we have attended.
Ladas & Parry
Antitrust Law Advisory Board
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom
Fenwick & West
Lockridge Grindal Nauen
Foley & Lardner
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer
Briggs and Morgan
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
Latham & Watkins
Constantine | Cannon
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.