Bad Faith Claims When Verdicts Exceed Policy Limits: Navigating Nuances of the Insurer's Duty to Settle

Best Practices for Insurers to Reduce Exposure; Options for Policyholders When Insurer Rejects Settlement Demand

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A


Conducted on Thursday, January 5, 2017

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926
Program Materials

This CLE webinar will provide counsel with a review of the rights and obligations of the policyholder and the insurer regarding settlement, the insurer’s liability for verdicts in excess of policy limits, actions insurers can take to reduce exposure to bad faith claims, and options for policyholders if the insurer rejects a settlement demand.

Description

Attempts to settle underlying claims are often the source of disagreement and dispute between the policyholder and its insurer. When an insurer fails to accept a reasonable settlement offered by an injured party, the policyholder is at risk that the ultimate verdict will exceed the policy limits. The insurer faces a separate risk—exposure to bad faith claims and liability for the entire amount of the judgment.

Navigating these scenarios requires a detailed understanding of the scope of the duty to settle. Counsel must understand the tactics commonly used and the options available to each side. Under some circumstances, an insurer may be justified in rejecting a settlement demand. In other circumstances, the policyholder is entitled to settle without its insurer’s consent and may sue the insurer for bad faith.

Listen as our authoritative panel of insurance practitioners discusses the rights and obligations of the policyholder and the insurer regarding settlement, the insurer’s liability for verdicts in excess of policy limits, actions insurers can take to reduce exposure to bad faith claims, and options for policyholders if the insurer rejects a settlement demand.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Scope of insurer’s duty to defend and duty to settle
  2. Insurer’s risk of claims for bad faith litigation
  3. Policyholder remedies when the insurer breaches its duty to settle
  4. Best practices for insurers to reduce exposure to bad faith litigation, including identifying the bad faith set up
  5. Options for policyholders when the insurer does not want to settle

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What is the scope of an insurer’s duty to defend and duty to settle?
  • What are the key factors for insurers when deciding whether to settle within the policy limits?
  • What factors do courts typically consider in deciding whether a particular settlement demand is reasonable?
  • What steps can insurers take to reduce exposure to bad faith litigation?
  • What options are available to policyholders who disagree with the insurer’s decision not to settle within the policy limits?

Faculty

Brian D. McDonald
Brian D. McDonald

Partner
Jones Day

Mr. McDonald is an Insurance Recovery partner in Jones Day's San Francisco office.  He has counseled...  |  Read More

Clark, Johanna
Johanna W. Clark

Shareholder
Carlton Fields Jorden Burt

Ms. Clark defends companies in both state and federal courts in class actions, insurance bad faith litigation,...  |  Read More

Horkovich, Robert
Robert M. Horkovich

Managing Shareholder
Anderson Kill

Mr. Horkovich focuses his practice on the area of insurance recovery. He has obtained over $5 billion in...  |  Read More

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

$297

Download

$297