Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Attorney Misconduct in Employment Depositions: Avoiding Rule 30(d)(2) Sanctions While Protecting Client Interests

Sanctionable Conduct, Types of Sanctions, Bringing and Defending Motions for Sanctions

Recording of a 90-minute CLE video webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Wednesday, October 9, 2024

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will examine FRCP Rule 30's standard for deposition conduct, specifically as it relates to attorney behavior during depositions in employment litigation. The panel will discuss sanctionable behavior under Rule 30(d)(2), providing examples and case law support demonstrating how the courts determine what behavior is sanctionable. The panel will address when parties should move for sanctions, discuss how to defend against motions for sanctions, and offer best practices for defending clients while avoiding deposition misconduct.

Description

Depositions play a key role in employment litigation as the evidence obtained often leads to settlement. Yet, attorney behavior and misconduct during depositions has led to federal courts increasingly imposing sanctions under Rule 30(d)(2).

Rule 30 provides the standard for deposition conduct and Rule 30(c)(2) specifically addresses the manner in which objections should be made. Namely, objections "must be stated concisely in a nonargumentative and nonsuggestive manner," and deponents may only be instructed not to answer a deposition question only when necessary to preserve privilege, to enforce a limitation ordered by the court, or to present a motion under Rule 30(d)(3).

Rule 30(d)(2) allows courts to impose sanctions on "any person who impedes, delays, or frustrates the fair examination of the deponent." Therefore, employment litigators should clearly understand what conduct is considered sanctionable under Rule 30(d)(2) and how they may best protect their clients' interests while avoiding deposition misconduct.

Listen as our expert panel provides an overview of Rule 30 as it pertains to attorney conduct during depositions, with a focus on Rule 30(d)(2), and discusses what the courts consider to be sanctionable attorney conduct and how it may be avoided. The panel will also discuss when to move for sanctions and how to defend against such motions.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Introduction
    1. Federal Rule 30(c)(2) and (d)(2)
  2. Sanctionable conduct
    1. Argumentative objections
    2. Suggestive objections
    3. Directing a deponent not to answer
      1. Exceptions
    4. Failing to intervene when a client engages in deposition misconduct
  3. Court analysis for determining whether to impose sanctions
  4. Types of sanctions
  5. When to move for sanctions
  6. Defending against sanctions motions
  7. Practitioner takeaways

Benefits

The panel will address these and other important considerations:

  • How does Rule 30 govern attorney objections made during depositions?
  • What is considered sanctionable conduct by attorneys when making objections or interacting with their clients during depositions?
  • When should a party move for sanctions under Rule 30(d)(2)?
  • How may a party defend against a motion for sanctions?

Faculty

Horton, James
James F. Bryton

Of Counsel
Littler Mendelson

Mr. Bryton focuses his practice as a labor and employment trial attorney. Utilizing his years of experience as a...  |  Read More

Ojserkis, Rebecca
Rebecca Ojserkis

Attorney
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll

Ms. Ojserkis is an Associate in Cohen Milstein’s Civil Rights & Employment Litigation practice, where...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

Download