Patent Threats: Initial Response Strategies

Evaluating Patent Defenses When Faced With a Notice Letter or Complaint

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A


Conducted on Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Recorded event now available


This CLE webinar will provide guidance for IP counsel to identify inherent defects in a patent, find prior art and potential inequitable conduct without a “scorched earth” search, and formulate other defenses using time and cost-effective methods.

Description

The first several hours after receiving a notice letter or being served with a complaint are critically important for companies and their counsel. This is the most valuable period to develop good defenses quickly.

Counsel must evaluate the patent threat and determine the most viable defenses and arguments to achieve the client's goals and defeat a patent threat—and quickly gather ammunition for use in a pre-litigation discussion or in drafting an answer to a complaint.

The key to success is understanding the techniques and strategies to improving the position of an accused infringer in a patent case or pre-litigation in a manner that is both time and cost efficient.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent litigators examines tactics for identifying inherent defects in the patent, finding prior art and potential inequitable conduct without a “scorched earth” search, and formulating other defenses in a cost-effective way. They will provide a practical checklist with steps to take when facing a patent threat.

Outline

  1. Ascertaining the threat
    1. The patent holder and its counsel
    2. The judge and forum
    3. Possibility of an injunction
    4. Products potentially at risk
  2. Identifying inherent defects in the patent
    1. Assignments/ownership
    2. Maintenance fees
    3. Small entity status
    4. Written description
    5. Indefiniteness
  3. Finding prior art and evidence of inequitable conduct
    1. Prior art that inventors or prosecuting attorney knew about
    2. Other sources of easily-found prior art
  4. Identifying other defenses
    1. Waiver
    2. Implied licenses/ exhaustion
    3. Laches
    4. Standards

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key questions:

  • How can counsel quickly gather ammunition for use in a pre-litigation conversation with a patent holder who has sent a patent notice letter?
  • Once a lawsuit has been filed, which defenses are “low-hanging fruit” that can be formulated and supported with evidence quickly and cheaply?
  • What strategies can counsel employ to develop strong defenses in a short amount of time?

Faculty

Brent K. Yamashita, Partner
DLA Piper US, East Palo Alto, Calif.

He is a patent litigator, with experience in computer hardware and software, hard disk drive, optical drive, storage systems, communication and mobile device technologies. He also prepares and prosecutes patents and reexamination petitions and regularly advises companies on IP issues.

Dr. Marc D. Peters, Partner
Morrison & Foerster, Palo Alto, Calif.

He focuses on representing clients in litigation and counseling involving electronics, semiconductor, and computer-related technologies. His experience also includes representing clients in a variety of industries and in trade secret, antitrust, copyright, and trademark matters.

Lisa Launer, Director and Associate General Counsel
Logitech, Fremont, Calif.

She is responsible for worldwide Intellectual Property litigation for Logitech Inc. and its affiliated foreign entities around the world. She is also a collaborator on worldwide patent strategy.

Ordering

On-Demand CLE - Streaming Audio

Our best recorded option for CLE accreditation. Includes recorded streaming audio of full program plus PDF handouts.

Strafford is an approved provider and can request CLE credit for On-Demand programs in the following states. (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)

AK, AZ, CA, CO, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY*, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY

*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.

**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.

On-Demand CLE Audio $69.00

How does this work?


Recorded Event

Includes full event recording plus handouts.

Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in the following states. (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)

AK, AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NM, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY

To apply for Continuing Education credit for a recorded event, contact Strafford CLE to obtain an Attorney Affirmation Form at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.

Recorded Webinar Download $69.00

How does this work?

Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $69.00

How does this work?

DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $69.00 plus $9.45 S&H

How does this work?

Webinar

Strafford webinars/teleconferences offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program).  Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

or call 1-800-926-7926

CLE Credits

Many states grant CLE credits for on-demand streaming audio programs and recorded events. Our programs are pre-approved in many states. Refer to our state CLE map for state-specific information.

or call 1-800-926-7926

Customer Reviews

Strafford’s program provided a good 'how to' checklist of common defenses to consider when a patent is asserted.

Justin A. Jernigan

Summa, Additon & Ashe

I liked the practical insights, particularly when tied to cases the presenters had worked on.

Michael Gray

Kohler

Strafford provided an enthusiastic presentation that focused on patent practice, not theory.

David H. Vance

Vance Intellectual Property

I liked the range of topics covered, from basic to advanced.

JoAnn Katzban

Garrity Graham Murphy Garofalo & Flinn

A very good nuts and bolts program on what to do in this area.

Carol Babbitt

The Law Office of Carol Coplan Babbitt

or call 1-800-926-7926

Intellectual Property Law Advisory Board

Stephen R. Baird

Shareholder

Winthrop & Weinstine

Charles S. Baker

Partner

Fulbright & Jaworski

David S. Bloch

Partner

Winston & Strawn

Ian N. Feinberg

Partner

Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson

Bassam N. Ibrahim

Shareholder

Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney

Mark P. Wine

Partner

Orrick

or call 1-800-926-7926

Our Guarantee

Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.