The URS, UDRP, ACPA and Beyond: Domain Name Enforcement in the gTLD Era
Strategies for Brand Protection, Leveraging Recent Decisions, Weighing the Pros and Cons
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
Conducted on Tuesday, March 7, 2017
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will provide guidance to trademark counsel on the advantages and disadvantages of the Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) system, the Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA). The panel will examine the considerations in determining which dispute resolution mechanism or court action makes sense to use when challenging infringing domains and offer strategies to navigate the systems.
The URS system is a rights protection mechanism introduced in connection with ICANN’s new gTLD program that provides trademark owners with an alternative in domain name disputes to the UDRP. Among the advantages of the URS are quicker adjudication and lower cost. However, the URS has disadvantages that should have trademark owners carefully considering which system to use.
For example, seven days after filing a complaint, a major brand owner successfully challenged domain names registered using new gTLDs, and those names were suspended. A disadvantage of URS is that it does not provide for the transfer of the domain name in question, and the brand owner cannot use the domain name during the suspension period.
Trademark owners and their counsel must understand the benefits and limitations of both the URS, UDRP and the ACPA to ensure that they are adequately protecting their trademarks online in the evolving domain name space.
Listen as our authoritative panel of trademark attorneys provides guidance to trademark counsel on the advantages and disadvantages of various rights protection mechanisms and strategies, including the URS, UDRP and ACPA. The panel will examine the considerations in determining how to develop and implement a successful domain name enforcement strategy, how to select the best dispute resolution mechanism, and how to manage a domain name portfolio as new gTLDs continue to be added to the domain name landscape.
- URS vs. UDRP vs. ACPA
- Pros and cons of using them
- When it makes sense to use each
- Recent court decisions/proceedings
- Strategies for navigating the dispute resolution mechanisms and potential court action
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- How has the domain name space evolved since the launch of the new gTLD program, and how do these changes affect overall enforcement concerns?
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of the URS? The UDRP? The ACPA?
- What factors should counsel consider when determining how to address an infringing domain name?
- What strategies should counsel employ to successfully navigate the URS, UDRP, ACPA and other rights protection mechanisms or forums?
Debra L. Innocenti, Partner
Ms. Innocenti maintains a diverse transactional and litigation practice for emerging companies in the technology and internet-related industries, and she uses her tech acumen to assist non-tech clients in navigating the complex, new-world legal issues presented by emerging technologies. Prior to her legal career, Ms. Innocenti was a professor at St. Mary’s University.
Jonathan S. Jennings, Partner
Pattishall McAuliffe Newbury Hilliard & Geraldson,
Mr. Jennings protects brands, copyrighted works and domain names throughout the world. As part of his practice, he represents plaintiffs and defendants in a wide variety of disputes involving trademark, copyright, trade secret, right of publicity, breach of contract, unfair competition and false advertising claims. Mr. Jennings teaches a course on right of publicity and privacy law at the John Marshall Law School.
CLE On-Demand - Streaming Video
Includes recorded streaming video of full program plus PDF handouts.
On-demand is the only recorded format recognized for CLE credits in DE, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WI.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.
**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.
CLE On-Demand Video $297.00
Includes full event recording plus handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in most states.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NJ, NM, NY, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording.
Additional copies of a recording can be purchased at a discount. Please call Strafford Customer Service toll-free at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10 or email firstname.lastname@example.org to place your order.
Recorded Webinar Download $297.00
Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Strafford webinars offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
CLE Credits By State
Strafford events are very organized, simple to access, and offer good information.
Santangelo Law Offices
Convenient and well-organized. Well-run program.
Michael V. Kruljac
The webinar contained lots of information on the subject matter and was very informative.
HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON
I appreciated each speaker’s focus on the most important areas to consider and felt they were, without a doubt, experts on the subject matter.
Strafford webinars are consistently the best organized CLE programs with great content.
Ladas & Parry
Intellectual Property Law Advisory Board
Winthrop & Weinstine
Fulbright & Jaworski
Winston & Strawn
Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.