Solar Financing Tax Equity Structures: Sale-Leasebacks, Inverted Leases, and Partnership Flips

Choosing the Right Structure, Weighing Advantages and Drawbacks of Various Structures

Note: CPE credit is not offered on this program

Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE webinar with Q&A


Conducted on Thursday, June 4, 2020

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926
Program Materials

This CLE webinar will discuss solar financing tax equity structures--sale-leasebacks, inverted leases, and partnership flips--and the advantages and disadvantages of each from a legal, business, financial, and tax perspective. The panel will examine current trends and issues in solar financings.

Description

There are three main tax equity structures in use currently for financing solar energy deals: sale-leasebacks, inverted leases, and partnership flips. There are also several variations on these basic structures.

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims in the companion cases of Bishop Hill Energy LLC and California Ridge Wind Energy LLC, found in favor of the government and denied a Section 1603 grant reimbursement for the taxpayer, a renewable energy developer. The court held that while developer fees are includible in cost basis and eligible for the Section 1603 grant, the court was not convinced that the developer fees in these cases were adequately substantiated.

Listen as our authoritative panel discusses the pros and cons of sale-leasebacks, inverted leases, and partnership flip tax equity structures. They will explain the legal, business, financial, and tax reasons driving the choice of structure and will discuss trends in solar financing as well as the investment tax credit.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Current state of the solar finance market and trends for the near future
  2. Choosing the appropriate tax equity structure
    1. Sale-leaseback
    2. Inverted lease
    3. Partnership flip
  3. Evaluating the tax risks
  4. Current issues in deals

Benefits

The panel will review these and other noteworthy issues:

  • When to choose one structure over another
  • What are the main issues on which the parties spend the most time in negotiations?
  • How are the Bishop Hill and California Ridge cases impacting how deals are structured?
  • What is the current market on such things as construction-start strategies, developer fees, basis step-ups, change-in-law risk, flip yields, DROs, tax insurance, unwinds, and withdrawal rights?

Faculty

Medina, Jorge
Jorge Medina

Partner
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman

Mr. Medina’s practice focuses on tax aspects of energy investment and financing transactions, including tax...  |  Read More

Martin, Keith
Keith Martin

Co-Head of Projects
Norton Rose Fulbright US

Mr. Martin is a transactional lawyer whose principal areas of practice are tax and project finance. He acted for 178...  |  Read More

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

$347

Download

$347