Products Liability Litigation: Addressing Other Similar Incidents and Lack of Prior Accidents Evidence
Navigating Admissibility Issues, Building a Solid Foundation Through Incident Reporting Procedures, and More
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
Conducted on Tuesday, September 6, 2016
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will prepare counsel to handle two critical evidentiary issues that arise in product liability trials: (1) preventing the plaintiff from introducing evidence of other incidents involving the same or similar products, and (2) laying the proper foundation for the admission of evidence of lack of similar incidents. The panel will outline effective strategies and discuss the benefits to product manufacturers of collecting incident data prior to litigation to maximize the chance of favorable rulings.
The admission of other similar incidents (OSI) involving products manufactured by the defendant in a product liability case can jeopardize an otherwise defensible case. For this reason, defense attorneys must make preventing the introduction of OSI evidence a priority in the defense of products liability cases and proactively take aggressive measures to ensure that OSI is not admitted.
Additionally, products liability defendants often benefit from favorable evidence showing the lack of similar incidents by the product in question, making it important for counsel to properly lay the foundation for the admission of this evidence and guide clients on proper recordkeeping policies and procedures to preserve such evidence.
Listen as our authoritative panel of products liability defense counsel discusses strategies for keeping bad evidence out and admitting favorable evidence on product safety, and the importance of establishing the foundation for these issues early on in a lawsuit. The panel will also discuss tips for counseling clients on incident reporting procedures.
- Strategies to prevent the admission of OSI evidence
- Restricting the scope of other incidents through written discovery and responding to requests for disclosure of incidents
- Limiting the relevance of incidents through opposing counsel’s experts
- Attacking purported relevance of OSI evidence
- Dealing with OSI at trial
- Strategies to introduce evidence of lack of similar incidents
- Laying the foundation during discovery and at trial
- Countering common objections by plaintiff’s counsel
- Basis for the admissibility of evidence regarding the absence of OSIs
- Counseling clients to establish solid record-keeping procedures
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- What is OSI and why is it important for defense attorneys to preclude or limit it in products liability cases?
- How can products liability counsel use favorable evidence of lack of similar incidents to bolster their clients’ case?
- What are some best practices for reporting and maintaining records of product incidents that will benefit product manufacturers in the event of future litigation?
Stephen J. McConnell, Partner
Mr. McConnell defends clients in product liability and mass tort litigation. He has also handled securities litigation, complex commercial litigation, and white-collar criminal litigation. He is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney with ample first-chair experience in both government and private practice cases and has successfully argued significant matters before federal and state trial and appellate courts. Mr. McConnell has represented consumer products manufacturers and leading global medical device and pharmaceutical companies, including Wyeth, for whom he served as first-chair trial counsel in the diet drug litigation.
Sean P. Wajert, Esq., Managing Partner
Shook Hardy & Bacon,
Mr. Wajert focuses primarily on complex commercial and products liability litigation. An experienced trial attorney, he has represented clients in the chemical, consumer product, pharmaceutical, medical device, food and fragrance, and industrial products sectors when they face significant product liability and mass tort claims. Mr. Wajert has litigated cases in federal and state courts in dozens of jurisdictions.
CLE On-Demand - Streaming Video
Includes recorded streaming video of full program plus PDF handouts.
On-demand is the only recorded format recognized for CLE credits in DE, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WI.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.
**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.
CLE On-Demand Video $297.00
Includes full event recording plus handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in most states.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NJ, NM, NY, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording.
Additional copies of a recording can be purchased at a discount. Please call Strafford Customer Service toll-free at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10 or email firstname.lastname@example.org to place your order.
Recorded Webinar Download $297.00
Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Strafford webinars offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
Many states grant CLE credits for on-demand streaming audio programs and recorded events. Our programs are pre-approved in many states. Refer to our state CLE map for state-specific information.
Very good breadth and depth of the subject matter - the speakers had a lot of experience and insight.
Ken J. Pedersen
Pedersen & Company
The program material was well organized and presented in a succinct fashion.
Bass, Berry & Sims
Clearly had right speakers for this seminar.
I like the convenience of a webinar since I don't have to travel anywhere.
Robin A. Clark
Clark & Glass
Strafford events are very organized, simple to access, and offer good information.
Santangelo Law Offices
Product Liability Advisory Board
Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer
Herzfeld & Rubin
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker
Herzfeld & Rubin
Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.