Parallel Patent Proceedings Before the PTAB and Federal Court Post-AIA
Navigating Litigation Stays, Discovery and Settlements Concurrent with PTAB Review
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
Conducted on Thursday, March 20, 2014
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will provide guidance to patent counsel involved in challenging or defending patent validity on the impact of concurrent proceedings at the USPTO and in the courts on stays, discovery and settlements. The panel will offer best practices for dealing with concurrent litigation and USPTO proceedings.
Description
The AIA offers alternative procedures to challenge patents. However, use of these procedures does not eliminate civil litigation and makes it more likely that the parties will be involved in concurrent USPTO and court proceedings regarding a patent's validity.
Counsel must consider how a PTAB review will have on a matter also in the courts. For example, the PTAB's decision in Versata invalidated the patent, which had been approved by the Federal Circuit after much litigation. Parties may also seek to stay litigation in favor of USPTO determination.
Patent counsel involved in concurrent patent matters must understand the impact on stays, discovery and settlements.
Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys examines the interplay between the new administrative review and district court proceedings, the limitations placed by the AIA, stays, and practical considerations post-AIA when determining whether to seek or oppose a stay pending IPR USPTO review. The panel will also discuss issues and considerations related to settlements and discovery, and will offer best practices for dealing with concurrent litigation and USPTO proceedings.
Outline
-
Interplay between the new administrative review and district court proceedings
- Limitations placed by the AIA
- Stays
- Practical considerations post-AIA when determining whether to seek or oppose a stay pending IPR USPTO review
- Discovery—issues and considerations
- Settlements—issues and considerations
- Lessons from recent USPTO actions and litigation
- Best practices for dealing with concurrent litigation and PTAB proceedings
Benefits
The panel will review these and other key questions:
- What litigation tactics can counsel employ to challenge or defend patent validity?
- What are the implications for discovery and settlement when patents are challenged in concurrent proceedings?
- What challenges do counsel face when challenging or defending patent validity in concurrent proceedings?
Following the speaker presentations, you'll have an opportunity to get answers to your specific questions during the interactive Q&A.
Faculty
Michael L. Kiklis, Partner
Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt,
Alexandria, Va.
Mr. Kiklis focuses on post-grant counseling, patent litigation and patent prosecution. With an extensive background in computer science, he focuses his practice on software patent matters. He frequently handles high stakes matters, having been involved in several cases in which over $1 billion was at stake.
Eric W. Schweibenz, Partner
Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt,
Alexandria, Va.
Mr. Schweibenz focuses on patent litigation in the federal courts and before the U.S. ITC. He represents domestic and foreign companies and their U.S. affiliates and subsidiaries across a spectrum of diverse technologies. He has worked on Section 337 ITC investigations, patent and trademark infringement and antitrust actions, Section 146 actions, and patent interference cases.
Ordering
On-Demand CLE - Streaming Audio
Our best recorded option for CLE accreditation. Includes recorded streaming audio of full program plus PDF handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and can request CLE credit for On-Demand programs in the following states. (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
AK, AZ, CA, CO, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY*, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY
*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.
**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.
On-Demand CLE Audio $297.00
Recorded Event
Includes full event recording plus handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in the following states. (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
AK, AZ, CO, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NM, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY
To apply for Continuing Education credit for a recorded event, contact Strafford CLE to obtain an Attorney Affirmation Form at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.
Recorded Webinar Download $297.00
Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
CD (Audio with Slide PDFs) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Webinar
Strafford webinars/teleconferences offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
CLE Credits
Many states grant CLE credits for on-demand streaming audio programs and recorded events. Our programs are pre-approved in many states. Refer to our state CLE map for state-specific information.
Customer Reviews
I liked the practical insights, particularly when tied to cases the presenters had worked on.
Michael Gray
Kohler
Strafford provided an enthusiastic presentation that focused on patent practice, not theory.
David H. Vance
Vance Intellectual Property
The program was very informative and included great examples and specific accounts/advice.
Kevin Kim
Robbins Arroyo
The program material was well organized and presented in a succinct fashion.
Leslie Ford
Bass, Berry & Sims
This was an excellent seminar. The speaker's were well versed and the material was excellent.
Peter Danias
Kaye Scholer
Intellectual Property Law Advisory Board
Shareholder
Winthrop & Weinstine
Partner
Fulbright & Jaworski
Partner
Winston & Strawn
Partner
Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson
Shareholder
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Partner
Orrick
Our Guarantee
Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.