Offers of Judgment in Employment Litigation After Campbell-Ewald and Fulton Dental

Analyzing the Viability of Rule 68 or Rule 67 as a Strategic Tool for Employers to Moot Individual, Class and Collective Claims

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A


Conducted on Thursday, September 28, 2017

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926
Program Materials

This CLE webinar will discuss the viability of Rule 67 or Rule 68 “pick-offs” as a strategic tool for employers’ counsel to moot individual, collective and class claims. The panel will discuss the continuing impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, provide insights into the Seventh Circuit’s recent Fulton Dental LLC v. Bisco Inc. decision, and outline strategies for employers facing individual, collective and class actions.

Description

Rule 68 offers of judgment and Rule 67 deposits are strategies used by defense counsel to efficiently resolve cases, whether individual, class or collective. An employee who rejects an employer’s settlement offer is liable for post-offer costs if he or she recovers less at trial than the settlement offer amount.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2016 Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez decision dealt a blow to employers facing class actions in holding that an unaccepted Rule 68 offer of judgment does not moot a plaintiff’s claim. The Court, however, left open the possibility that a defendant may be able to moot a case by other means, including by tendering actual payment of the plaintiff’s requested relief.

The Seventh Circuit expanded on the Campbell-Ewald ruling in its June 20, 2017 decision, Fulton Dental LLC v. Bisco Inc., holding that depositing an unaccepted settlement offer with a federal court under Rule 67 also does not moot a putative class action.

Notwithstanding, Rule 68 offers retain value in the appropriate case. Unaccepted Rule 68 offers of judgment still permit a defendant to shift post-offer costs to the employee, and they can cut off an employee’s right to attorney fees if properly drafted.

Employers’ counsel using Rule 68 offers should carefully consider the proper timing of the offer, impact of the mootness doctrine, and potential for the judgment to be used against the employer in future litigation.

Listen as our authoritative panel of employment litigators discusses the current viability of Rule 67 or Rule 68 “pick-offs” in employment cases. The panel will discuss the potential consequences for employers making settlement offers and effective strategies for using offers of judgment.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Rule 68 offers of judgment—overview
  2. Rule 67 deposits with a federal court—overview
  3. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez and mootness
  4. Implications of Fulton Dental LLC v. Bisco Inc.
  5. Strategic considerations with Rule 68 offers
  6. Drafting the Rule 68 offer of judgment—best practices
  7. Adapting Rule 68 in arbitration

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How has the Supreme Court’s Campbell-Ewald ruling affected offers of judgment in wage and hour collective actions?
  • What is the anticipated impact of the Seventh Circuit’s recent Fulton Dental decision?
  • What strategic advantages does a Rule 68 offer of judgment present for employment counsel defending discrimination or wage and hour litigation?
  • What are some strategic considerations for employment litigators evaluating whether and when to make a Rule 68 settlement offer?
  • What are the best practices for drafting effective offers of judgment?

Faculty

Fox, Stephen
Stephen E. Fox

Shareholder
Polsinelli

Mr. Fox has spent more than 25 years in boardrooms and courtrooms acting as a trusted advisor to and litigation...  |  Read More

Levin, Gabrielle
Gabrielle Levin

Partner
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher

Ms. Levin's practice focuses on representing corporate clients in securities, employment, and general litigation...  |  Read More

Pessen, Abigail
Abigail Pessen

Mediator and Arbitrator
Abigail Pessen Dispute Resolution Services

Ms. Pessen started her dispute resolution firm in 2000, after years in the trenches as a litigator. She...  |  Read More

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

$297

Download

$297