Maximizing Patent Prosecution Opportunities in Europe: Tactics for Counsel When Drafting U.S.-Origin Applications
Navigating Differing USPTO and EPO Legal Standards While Maintaining U.S. Patent Strategy
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
Conducted on Thursday, January 23, 2014
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will provide guidance for patent counsel in drafting U.S.-origin patent applications to maximize prosecution opportunities in both the U.S. and Europe. After discussing each area, the panel will offer best practices for U.S. patent application drafters to protect inventions in Europe without sacrificing U.S. strategy.
When drafting U.S. patent applications, counsel's initial focus is generally to position it for success in the USPTO. Many patentholders also want global patent protection and failing to consider other legal standards can prove detrimental to achieving that end. This program will compare and contrast certain USPTO and EPO legal standards.
Important differences exist between the U.S. and Europe systems, including standards for priority, amendments, obviousness, enablement and written description. As a result, neglecting these differences when drafting the U.S.-origin application can negatively impact prosecution opportunities in Europe.
Patent counsel's planning for European patent requirements during the USPTO process in anticipation of global protection will reduce costs and can overcome a number of obstacles presented by Europe's less flexible approach to granting patent protection.
Listen as our authoritative panel of U.S. and European patent counsel discusses key considerations for drafting U.S. patent applications to maximize prosecution opportunities in Europe and examines important differences between the USPTO and EPO approaches to patent applications. The panel will offer best practices for U.S. patent application drafters to protect inventions in Europe without sacrificing U.S. strategy—and vice versa.
- The EPO takes a literal approach to reading all documents
- Drafting applications with an eye to potential future amendments
- Inventive step
- Methods of treatment and diagnostic uses
The panel will review these and other key questions:
- What are the key considerations for patent counsel drafting U.S. applications when global patent protection is anticipated or desired?
- What are the significant differences between the U.S. and European approaches to patent applications?
- What steps should counsel take when drafting U.S. patent applications to maximize protection in Europe?
Following the speaker presentations, you'll have an opportunity to get answers to your specific questions during the interactive Q&A.
Rebecca M. McNeill
VIVICAR Law, PLLC,
Ms. McNeill is a U.S. patent attorney at VIVICAR Law, PLLC, an IP and business law firm with an international client base where her client-focused practice includes patent prosecution, counseling and litigation. Ms. McNeill specializes in the biotech and pharma space with over 18 years of experience, including a long tenure at one of the U.S.'s largest IP firms. She has also served as the Head of IP and Legal Affairs for a venture-backed biotech startup.
Jens Viktor Nørgaard, Partner, Head of Biotechnology & Plant Sciences
Mr. Nørgaard is a Partner and Head of Biotech at HØIBERG, a leading life-science IPR law firm in the Medicon Valley Region in Denmark. He is a European patent attorney specializing in biotech and medtech practice with 15 years of experience, including a period as in-house director of IPR at two biotech companies.
On-Demand CLE - Streaming Audio
Our best recorded option for CLE accreditation. Includes recorded streaming audio of full program plus PDF handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and can request CLE credit for On-Demand programs in the following states. (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
AK, AZ, CA, CO, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY*, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY
*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.
**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.
On-Demand CLE Audio $69.00
Includes full event recording plus handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in the following states. (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
AK, AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NM, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY
To apply for Continuing Education credit for a recorded event, contact Strafford CLE to obtain an Attorney Affirmation Form at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.
Recorded Webinar Download $69.00
Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $69.00
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $69.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Strafford webinars/teleconferences offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.
Many states grant CLE credits for on-demand streaming audio programs and recorded events. Our programs are pre-approved in many states. Refer to our state CLE map for state-specific information.
Strafford provided an enthusiastic presentation that focused on patent practice, not theory.
David H. Vance
Vance Intellectual Property
I liked the practical insights, particularly when tied to cases the presenters had worked on.
I liked that Strafford's program covered real life situations and claims.
I thought the webinar was well-organized and the division of the topics flowed smoothly.
Farella Braun + Martel
Points were clear and followed the presentation materials. Each speaker sounded confident in their presentation.
Bonnie L. Schmidt
Willkie Farr & Gallagher
Intellectual Property Law Advisory Board
Winthrop & Weinstine
Fulbright & Jaworski
Winston & Strawn
Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.