Leveraging Latest CERCLA Decisions and Navigating New Complexities
Key Lessons on Parent Liability for Subsidiary Conduct, Arranger Liability, Divisibility, Statute of Limitations Triggers, and Settlement Terms
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
Conducted on Tuesday, April 11, 2017
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will discuss the latest key federal court CERCLA decisions, provide insights into lessons from the decisions for environmental counsel and their clients going forward, and offer best practices for handling CERCLA issues.
Counsel must be up-to-date and understand the significant developments over the past year from key federal court rulings. For example, new federal courts of appeal and state court precedents support piercing the corporate veil for parent liability for CERCLA cleanup costs arising from subsidiary conduct. This runs counter to the standard in some circuits to consider a parent company legally separate from its subsidiary and not liable for the subsidiary’s actions.
Recent rulings also conclude that federal district courts have an independent obligation to scrutinize CERCLA settlement terms, rather than giving full deference to the parties. Under this standard, courts must independently scrutinize the terms of a consent decree by comparing “the proportion of total projected costs to be paid by the [settling parties] with the proportion of liability attributable to them.”
In another development, there is a circuit split over whether a non-CERCLA consent decree triggers the three-year CERCLA statute of limitations. The Second and Third Circuits disagree over whether only a CERCLA consent decree triggers the limitations period or if it comes into play via a settlement that does not explicitly discuss CERCLA liability.
In addition, seven years after the landmark Supreme Court decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States, 556 U.S. 599 (2009), federal courts of appeal and district courts continue to clarify the circumstances in which a person is liable as an “arranger” under CERCLA for arranging for the disposal of hazardous substances.
Finally, federal courts of appeal and district courts continue to flesh out and explain the divisibility defense to joint and several liability under CERCLA, which allows cleanup costs to be apportioned where a single harm originating from different sources is theoretically capable of being divided and there is reasonable basis for apportionment.
Listen as our panel of environmental attorneys provides an analysis of the latest and most important federal court CERCLA decisions in 2016. The panel will provide insight into what those decisions mean going forward and offer best practices for handling CERCLA issues.
- District court CERCLA decisions
- Federal appellate court CERCLA decisions
- What the decisions mean for future cases
- Best practices in light of recent CERCLA decisions
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- Under what circumstances do companies need to proactively address potential parent liability for CERCLA cleanup costs caused by a subsidiary?
- What triggers an obligation on the part of a federal district court to delve into the terms of a CERCLA settlement agreement?
- Under what circumstances is a person liable as an “arranger” under CERCLA?
- Does any kind of consent decree related to a CERCLA case start the three-year statute of limitations?
- What evidence is necessary to establish the divisibility of harm and avoid joint and several liability under CERCLA?
Jane E. Fedder, Shareholder, Vice Chair, Environmental Practice
Ms. Fedder serves as the Vice-Chair of the firm’s Environmental Practice Group. She concentrates her nationwide practice in two areas: environmental litigation and insurance recovery litigation. Ms. Fedder has extensive experience representing clients in complex environmental litigation, administrative proceedings, ADR and mediations involving the gamut of substances and activities regulated by international, national, state and local environmental authorities
Leah J. Knowlton, Partner
Taylor English Duma,
Ms. Knowlton has more than 25 years of experience counseling clients on environmental regulatory matters and representing them in criminal and civil litigation involving chemical contamination and other environmental violations. Ms. Knowlton regularly develops and implements environmental compliance management systems and advises clients on chemical safety and security matters. She has extensive experience assessing environmental risk and negotiating contracts and remediation plans in corporate and real estate transactions.
Belynda S. Reck, Partner
Ms. Reck’s practice focuses on environmental, product liability and complex business matters. She has successfully represented both large international companies and small businesses in cases involving toxic tort, global warming, CERCLA, RCRA, and a variety of other statutes and common law. She has trial experience in both state and federal court and also has extensive experience resolving matters in both arbitration and mediation. In her practice, she has litigated environmental matters arising from a variety of facilities and operations.
CLE On-Demand - Streaming Video
Includes recorded streaming video of full program plus PDF handouts.
On-demand is the only recorded format recognized for CLE credits in DE, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WI.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.
**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.
CLE On-Demand Video $297.00
Includes full event recording plus handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in most states.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NJ, NM, NY, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording.
Additional copies of a recording can be purchased at a discount. Please call Strafford Customer Service toll-free at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10 or email firstname.lastname@example.org to place your order.
Recorded Webinar Download $297.00
Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Strafford webinars offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
CLE Credits By State
I liked that the presentation was in-depth with useful information and provided excellent written materials.
Dan J. Jordanger
Hunton & Williams
The presentations were excellent and timely, and I thought the Q&A was very good.
J. Thomas Carrato
I was impressed with the examples and the practical applications of the concepts.
Connie Sue Martin
Bullivant Houser Bailey
I liked the breadth and overview of trends in case law and claims/defenses.
Donald J. Moran
Pedersen & Houpt
Strafford's program was well organized and provided a good level of depth.
Environmental Law Advisory Board
Loeb & Loeb
Shipman & Goodwin
Barnes & Thornburg
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
Arnold & Porter
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
Dinsmore & Shohl
Beveridge & Diamond
Crowell & Moring
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.