Irrational Thinking in Personal Injury Trials: Effectively Countering Emotional Arguments

A live 90-minute CLE webinar with interactive Q&A

Thursday, June 25, 2020

1:00pm-2:30pm EDT, 10:00am-11:30am PDT

Early Registration Discount Deadline, Friday, June 5, 2020

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will discuss how counsel litigating claims arising from commercial vehicle accidents, toxic exposure, and other personal injury claims can recognize, leverage, and counter emotional thinking by the jury. The panel will discuss the prevalence of illogical thinking and show how to harness or confront it during all phases of the case.


When someone concludes that his/her emotional reaction to something defines its reality, that person is engaged in emotional reasoning. Facts, statistics, and research are often disregarded in favor of the "truth" of the feeling. Indeed, numerous studies demonstrate that most decisions are driven by emotion and then justified by rationalization.

Jurors and judges are no different. If jurors can be convinced to fear a product or a defendant, then they are more likely to view them as dangerous, despite facts to the contrary. Litigators count on and anticipate the fact that emotion impacts how jurors process information, assess blame and responsibility, and impose consequences.

Moreover, studies have shown that human beings, including jurors, tend to substitute feelings they do not like with ones they do. For example, people are generally uncomfortable with uncertainty, so they replace it with certitude. They replace complexity with simplicity.

Listen as the panel describes how to recognize appeals to simplistic, emotional thinking in a personal injury case and learn how to refocus jurors and judges on facts, science, and other concrete evidence.



  1. Emotional thinking and why it can be effective
    1. Uncertainty and certitude
    2. Us vs. them
    3. Power/choice vs. lack of control
  2. Understanding how these beliefs benefit listeners
  3. Finding ways to make jurors recognize faulty thinking


The panel will review these and other essential steps:

  • How to recognize arguments based on emotions
  • How to neutralize emotional thinking
  • How to recast and replace emotional thinking


Jarvis, Lori
Lori E. Jarvis

Hunton Andrews Kurth

Ms. Jarvis' practice focuses on environmental litigation and toxic torts, mass tort litigation and class actions,...  |  Read More

Malinowski, Matthew
Matthew J. Malinowski


Mr. Malinowski focuses his practice on highly complex, "bet the company" trials and litigation. He has...  |  Read More

Live Webinar

Buy Live Webinar
Includes Early Discount Savings of $50 (through 06/05/20)

Live Webinar


Buy Live Webinar & Recording
Includes special savings of $170 (through 06/05/20)

Live Webinar & Download


Live Webinar & DVD

$224 + $24.45 S&H

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Includes Early Discount Savings of $50 (through 06/05/20)

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

48 hours after event



48 hours after event



10 business days after event

$147 + $24.45 S&H