Environmental Obligations in Bankruptcy: Reconciling the Conflicting Goals of Bankruptcy and Environmental Laws

Pre- vs. Post-Petition Claims, Enforcement Actions, Statutory Super Liens, Asset Sales, Abandonment and More

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A


Conducted on Thursday, April 4, 2019

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926
Program Materials

This CLE webinar will investigate the conflicts that exist between the Bankruptcy Code and state and federal environmental statutes and provide counsel with an understanding of how to resolve these issues in bankruptcy proceedings. The panel will review relevant court decisions and why some environmental claims receive special treatment in bankruptcy.

Description

The Bankruptcy Code frequently conflicts with state and federal environmental laws in the administration of a bankruptcy case. The goal in bankruptcy proceedings is to give a debtor a "fresh start" by identifying the assets and liabilities of the debtor to enable the debtor to discharge and pay outstanding claims under the priorities established in the Bankruptcy Code that will allow the debtor to reorganize or in some cases liquidate.

In contrast, the "polluter pay" policy of environmental laws requires remediation of environmental contamination, often over an extended period and with ultimate remediation costs not yet determined, with the expense and responsibility of cleanup allocated among potentially responsible parties (PRPs).

PRP claims and government enforcement actions receive differing treatment in bankruptcy. Some obligations and claims may be discharged, while some may survive depending on when the claim arises, the existence of statutory or super liens, public health, the status of ongoing remediation, and other considerations.

Environmental obligations also impact the ability of the debtor to conduct a 363 asset sale and abandon the contaminated property. Counsel must understand how environmental issues impact these bankruptcy rights.

Listen as our authoritative panel examines the conflicts between environmental law and bankruptcy law and how various types of environmental obligations and claims are treated in bankruptcy. The panel will review court decisions and provide analysis of relevant Bankruptcy Code provisions to explain how cost recovery, contribution, remediation, and other actions are evaluated in bankruptcy. The panel will also discuss pre-petition vs. post-petition claims, enforcement actions that can trump the automatic stay, the effect of super lien statutes, environmental reserves, and other ways that environmental claims can uniquely impact bankruptcy proceedings.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Introduction
    1. The interplay of the Bankruptcy Code and environmental statutes
    2. Treatment of environmental liabilities under Bankruptcy Code
    3. Environmental obligations and claims in bankruptcy
    4. Dischargeability of environmental obligations and claims under Chapter 11
  2. Treatment of post-petition environmental cleanup as an administrative expense (28 U.S.C. 959(b))
  3. Estimating and discharging contingent environmental claims
  4. Sales of Contaminated Assets Through Bankruptcy
  5. Case Studies
    1. Sale of Real Property
    2. Recovering costs from a non-viable entity
    3. Structuring settlements with multiple parties

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • When are environmental claims dischargeable in bankruptcy and what are the limitations?
  • What kinds of governmental actions are unaffected by the automatic stay?
  • When are post-petition cleanup expenses treated as first priority administrative expenses?
  • How are contingent environmental claims for contribution or cost recovery claims addressed in bankruptcy?
  • Can the bankrupt debtor sell or abandon contaminated assets?
  • How do governmental agencies with outstanding cleanup orders and environmental claims influence the outcome of the bankruptcy case?
  • Due diligence considerations for a sale of assets in bankruptcy proceedings
  • Drafting and negotiating tips

Faculty

Otis, Andrew
Andrew D. Otis

Partner
Locke Lord

Mr. Otis provides clients strategic and cost effective solutions to their remediation, permitting and compliance needs....  |  Read More

Rigano, Nicholas
Nicholas C. Rigano

Partner
Rigano

Throughout his practice, Mr. Rigano has represented key constituents in Chapter 7 and 11 bankruptcy cases, including...  |  Read More

Tarantino, William
William F. Tarantino

Partner
Morrison & Foerster

Drawing on his expertise in environmental health, Mr. Tarantino’s practice focuses on environmental and consumer...  |  Read More

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

$297

Download

$297