Design Patents: Meeting Obviousness and Novelty Requirements

A live 90-minute CLE webinar with interactive Q&A


Thursday, October 5, 2017 (in 13 days)
1:00pm-2:30pm EDT, 10:00am-11:30am PDT


This CLE webinar will provide guidance to patent counsel prosecuting and litigating design patent claims. The panel will examine recent USPTO and court treatment of novelty and obviousness issues and offer best practices for prosecuting and defending against obviousness and novelty attacks in litigation.

Description

While many of the same requirements govern patentability of utility inventions and designs, the application of those requirements in these two contexts can be quite different. Like utility inventions, designs must be novel and not obvious, but recent ambiguous rulings from the USPTO and courts have blurred the distinction between the two. As a result, it can be seemingly easier to prove lack of novelty based on a single reference that is not identical to the claimed design than it can be to prove that a design is obvious.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys examines the current novelty and obviousness standards for design patents, and how the case law in these areas has developed. The panel will discuss steps that companies and counsel can take to challenge novelty and obviousness rejections in prosecution, and offer best practices for defending against such attacks in post grant proceedings at the USPTO and in court.

Outline

  1. The novelty standard for designs and how it has evolved based on recent rulings from the Federal Circuit
  2. The obviousness standard for designs and how it has evolved based on recent rulings from the Federal Circuit
  3. Recent USPTO and district court treatment of novelty and obviousness
  4. Challenging novelty and obviousness rejections at the USPTO
  5. Best practices for defending against obviousness and novelty attacks in post grant proceedings and in litigation

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How do the novelty and obviousness requirements for design patents differ from utility patents and from each other?
  • How has the Federal Circuit and PTAB treated the issue of novelty and obviousness for design patents?
  • What are the steps that patent applicants can take to stand up to novelty and obviousness rejections before the USPTO?

Faculty

Christopher V. Carani, Shareholder
McAndrews Held & Malloy, Chicago

Mr. Carani is nationally recognized in the field of design law, regarding the protection and enforcement of aesthetic design through the use of design patents, copyrights and trade dress. A registered attorney before the USPTO, Mr. Carani secures and enforces design rights for some of the world’s most design-centric companies and designers. He has litigated design right cases in subject matter areas ranging from footwear and apparel to medical devices and furniture. In 2016, IAM Magazine included Mr. Carani in its IAM 1000 referring to him as one of the U.S.’s “pre-eminent design law experts.” He is currently the Chair of the AIPPI Design Rights Committee and former Chair of both the ABA’s Design Rights Committee and AIPLA Committee on Industrial Designs. Mr. Carani is the Editor-in-Chief of the forthcoming book entitled “Design Rights: Functionality and Scope of Protection.” The book will be published in October of 2017 by publisher Walters Klowers N.V. 

Tracy-Gene Durkin, Director
Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, Washington, D.C.

Ms. Durkin heads the firm’s Mechanical and Design Patent Group. With nearly 30 years of experience obtaining and enforcing IP rights, she has a deep understanding of utility and design patents, trademarks, and copyrights. Ms. Durkin has been an Adjunct Professor at George Mason University Law School and has spoken internationally on topics such as the interplay between design patents and trade dress, and protection of user interface and the user experience. She is currently a Vice Chair of the Industrial Designs Committee of IP Section of the ABA.

Robert S. Katz, Esq.
Banner & Witcoff, Washington, D.C.

In his practice, Mr. Katz has helped procure over 6,000 design patents in the U.S. and over 18,000 design patents/registrations outside the U.S., and has helped to successfully enforce over 100 design patents. Mr. Katz has also provided advice and prepared opinions regarding the patentability of inventions, patent infringement, patent validity, and trade secret protection to help clients properly assess the advantages and disadvantages of certain intellectual property and business decisions. He is a frequent speaker on industrial design-related topics and is a professor at George Washington University Law School teaching Design Law and at Georgetown University Law School teaching IP Pretrial Litigation Skills. Mr. Katz currently serves as Treasurer of FICPI's U.S. Section and as Vice Chair of INTA's Design Rights Committee.


Live Webinar

Live Webinar $297.00

Add a colleague on the same connection in the same room for only $97.00 in the shopping cart or by calling customer service.

This webinar is eligible for at least 1.5 general CLE credits.

CLE credits are not available for PR.

*In KS, OH, PA, for more than 1 attendee on the connection you must contact Strafford CLE via email or call 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 prior to the program for special instructions.


Recordings

CLE On-Demand - Streaming Video

Includes recorded streaming video of full program plus PDF handouts.

On-demand is the only recorded format recognized for CLE credits in DE, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WI.

AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)

*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.

**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.

CLE On-Demand Video $297.00
Available 48 hours after the live event

How does this work?


Recorded Event

Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live webinar).

Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in most states.

AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NJ, NM, NY, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording.

Additional copies of a recording can be purchased at a discount. Please call Strafford Customer Service toll-free at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10 or email customerservice@straffordpub.com to place your order.

Recorded Webinar Download $297.00
Available 48 hours after the live event

How does this work?

Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?

DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

How does this work?


Registration Plus Recorded Event

Best value!

Live Webinar & Webinar Download $394.00

Recorded Webinar Download Only $97.00 with Registration/Webinar Combo

Live Webinar & Audio Download $394.00

Recorded Audio Download (MP3) Only $97.00 with Registration/MP3 Combo

Live Webinar & DVD $394.00 plus $9.45 S&H

DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) Only $97.00 with Registration/DVD Combo


Webinar

Strafford webinars offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program).  Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.

or call 1-800-926-7926

Can't Attend the Live Program?

CLE Credits By State

See CLE State Map >

or call 1-800-926-7926

Customer Reviews

Strafford provided an enthusiastic presentation that focused on patent practice, not theory.

David H. Vance

Vance Intellectual Property

I liked the practical insights, particularly when tied to cases the presenters had worked on.

Michael Gray

Kohler

I liked the combination of the substantive material and the legal perspective.

Jane Shea

Frost Brown Todd

One of the best webinars we have attended.

Chloe Hecht

Ladas & Parry

Strafford's program was well organized and provided a good level of depth.

Alex Schimel

Bilzin Sumberg

or call 1-800-926-7926

Patent Law Advisory Board

Charles S. Baker

Partner

Locke Lord

David S. Bloch

Partner

Winston & Strawn

Irah H. Donner

Partner

Manatt

Ian N. Feinberg

Partner

Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson

Anthony J. Fitzpatrick

Partner

Duane Morris

David Segal

Senior IP Counsel

Intel

Astrid R. Spain

Partner

Jones Day

Mark P. Wine

Partner

Orrick

or call 1-800-926-7926

Our Guarantee

Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.