Depositions in Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Litigation: 30(b)(6) and Fact Witnesses
Taking and Representing Fact Witness and Corporate Representative Depositions, Navigating Ethical Issues in Witness Preparation
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
Conducted on Thursday, February 9, 2017
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will provide litigators for policyholders and insurers with best practices and practical approaches for questioning or preparing fact witnesses and corporate witnesses in coverage and bad faith litigation. The panel will outline their experiences and perspectives on how to leverage the testimony of corporate representatives on both sides of the docket, using Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) as a framework. The panel will also discuss various ethical issues that arise when taking or responding to a deposition in coverage and bad faith litigation under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct.
Taking and responding to depositions in insurance coverage and bad faith litigation involves nuances unique to the niche practice of insurance law. Planning deposition strategy often requires an in-depth knowledge of the insurance policy, as well an underlying or ancillary matter. The testimony of fact witnesses, including the insurance adjuster as well as corporate representatives for both sides, can often determine the outcome of the case.
In cases involving liability coverage, where there is often an underlying matter, questions arise as to the use of fact witnesses and experts from the underlying litigation, and how to prepare for those depositions in cases where the doctrine of res judicata potentially applies.
Rule 30(b)(6) allows the policyholder to directly question the insurer’s corporate representatives about specific topics related to pending litigation. The insurer can designate the representative of their choice—and that person may or may not be the actual claims handler.
If the 30(b)(6) witness is not the claims handler, can the policyholder subpoena the claims handler to testify at trial? The policyholder must strategically decide how to best utilize the 30(b)(6) testimony in conjunction with questioning the claims handler.
As with any case, the conduct of counsel raises important ethical issues in planning deposition strategy, and specifically obtaining the circumstantial evidence needed to prove or disprove an insurance bad faith case.
Listen as our panel of experienced insurance litigators explains how policyholders and insurers can effectively handle deponents in coverage litigation.
- Scope of Rule 30(b)(6) depositions
- Drafting effective 30(b)(6) deposition notices
- Selecting and preparing the 30(b)(6) witness
- Scope of questions and testimony for 30(b)(6) witnesses
- Use of 30(b)(6) testimony at trial
- Ethical issues in planning deposition strategy
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- What are the policyholder’s options if the insurer designates someone other than the claims handler for a 30(b)(6) deposition?
- To what extent must or should counsel educate a witness in advance of a 30(b)(6) deposition?
- What are counsel’s obligations in preparing a witness under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct?
Sherilyn Pastor, Partner
McCarter & English,
Ms. Pastor is Practice Group Leader of her firm's Insurance Coverage Group. She is an experienced trial attorney, who has secured hundreds of millions of dollars in insurance for corporate policyholders. She litigates complex coverage matters throughout the country and abroad, and provides insurance coverage advice to clients assessing their potential risks, analyzing new insurance products, and considering the adequacy of their programs. She publishes and lectures frequently on insurance, trial skills and ethics matters.
Alan P. Jacobus, Principal
Mr. Jacobus' practice over the past decade has largely centered on high risk, high value insurance coverage litigation, but he comes from a broad civil and commercial litigation and trial background. He has tried jury trials to verdict in CA, IL and LA. Several of his cases have resulted in written opinions in trial courts and courts of appeal, and he has argued appeals in both state and federal courts.
CLE On-Demand - Streaming Video
Includes recorded streaming video of full program plus PDF handouts.
On-demand is the only recorded format recognized for CLE credits in DE, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WI.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.
**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.
CLE On-Demand Video $297.00
Includes full event recording plus handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in most states.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NJ, NM, NY, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording.
Additional copies of a recording can be purchased at a discount. Please call Strafford Customer Service toll-free at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10 or email firstname.lastname@example.org to place your order.
Recorded Webinar Download $297.00
Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Strafford webinars offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
An excellent opportunity to earn ETHICS CLE credits in states where webinars are accredited. Note: Strafford cannot guarantee that Virginia will approve ethics credits for this event.
Many states grant CLE credits for on-demand streaming audio programs and recorded events. Our programs are pre-approved in many states. Refer to our state CLE map for state-specific information.
I enjoyed the speaker's helpful insights for insurance practitioners and I particularly liked their 'best practice' tips.
The speakers were very clear in their explanations and the practical insight was much appreciated.
Colodny, Fass, Talenfeld, Karlinsky & Abate
The program was extremely informative, easy to access and very organized.
Fineman Krekstein & Harris
I thought the content was substantive.
Debra Curcio Lister
We were given simple and clear answers to complex questions, lots to work with.
Patrick R. Kelly
Glenn, Feldmann, Darby & Goodlatte
Insurance Law Advisory Board
Greve Clifford Wengel & Paras
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
Farella Braun + Martel
Law Offices of Alan Palmer Jacobus
Drewry Simmons Vornehm
Whiteford Taylor Preston
Clyde & Co.
Jones Satre & Weimer
Hinshaw & Culbertson
Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.