Demonstrating Use in Commerce for Trademark Applications
Navigating Use in Commerce Requirements Under the Lanham Act and for Purposes of Registration
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
Conducted on Tuesday, January 31, 2017
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will provide guidance to trademark counsel on “use in commerce” for trademark applications under the Lanham Act as well as for trademark registrations. The panel will discuss the impact of recent decisions on use in commerce and will offer strategies for providing evidence of use in commerce.
The Federal Circuit recently reversed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (TTAB) cancellation of two marks, concluding a church’s out-of-state sales of goods bearing the disputed slogan invoked Lanham Act protection [Christian Faith Fellowship v. Adidas AG (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2016)]. The TTAB previously ruled that the church’s sales were insufficient for the mark to be registered. The Federal Circuit’s decision provides IP attorneys with guidance on how much actual use in commerce is necessary to register a mark.
In another recent case, the TTAB found a use-based trademark application was void ab initio because the applicant did not use the mark in commerce in connection with its goods prior to filing the application [Doctor’s Assoc. v. Janco L.L.C. (T.T.A.B. Jan. 7, 2016)]. In Janco, the TTAB took a narrow position on what constitutes use in interstate commerce.
To prove use of a trademark in commerce, the applicant must demonstrate that each of the specific goods and services in the application or registration is currently sold and delivered to U.S. customers under the mark. Counsel to trademark applicants must understand what it takes to show sufficient nexus between the trademark and the use of the mark while meeting the USPTO’s specimen requirements.
Listen as our authoritative panel examines what “use in commerce” is under the Lanham Act and for purposes of trademark registration. The panel will discuss what is proper or acceptable evidence of use in commerce and offer best practices for demonstrating use in commerce.
- Use in commerce
- Under the Lanham Act
- For purposes of trademark registration
- Proper or acceptable evidence of use in commerce
- Best practices for demonstrating use in commerce
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- What is the effect of the Federal Circuit’s fairly broad interpretation of use in commerce in determining what is necessary to register a trademark?
- How will the TTAB’s narrow reading of what constitutes use of a mark in interstate commerce impact applications or registrations?
- What strategies should counsel employ to demonstrate sufficient nexus between a trademark and use of the mark in commerce?
Stephen R. Baird, Shareholder
Winthrop & Weinstine,
Mr. Baird heads the Intellectual Property and Trademark and Brand Management Practice Groups, and his practice emphasizes trademark law, related unfair competition law and copyright law. He counsels clients on trademark usage and clearance, branding strategies, portfolio management, litigation and enforcement, Internet domain name disputes, licensing and prosecution.
Jonathan Hudis, Partner
Quarles & Brady,
Mr. Hudis counsels clients in trademark, copyright, unfair competition and trade secrets matters and is well versed in trademark prosecution and registered copyright protection matters. He is an adjunct professor of trademark and unfair competition law at the George Mason University School of Law.
Linda K. McLeod, Partner
Ms. McLeod's practice focuses on litigation before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and the courts, trademark clearance and prosecution, and client counseling. She gained significant expertise while serving as Administrative Trademark Judge and Interlocutory Attorney with the TTAB. She sat on panels that decided cases involving a variety of marks, including product configurations and color trademarks.
CLE On-Demand - Streaming Video
Includes recorded streaming video of full program plus PDF handouts.
On-demand is the only recorded format recognized for CLE credits in DE, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WI.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.
**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.
CLE On-Demand Video $297.00
Includes full event recording plus handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in most states.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NJ, NM, NY, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording.
Additional copies of a recording can be purchased at a discount. Please call Strafford Customer Service toll-free at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10 or email firstname.lastname@example.org to place your order.
Recorded Webinar Download $297.00
Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Strafford webinars offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
CLE Credits By State
I thought the content was excellent: concise, well-organized, and from industry experts.
Elizabeth Anne Spavins
Covington & Burling
All speakers seemed very knowledgeable about the subject and were very good at presenting.
Rader, Fishman & Grauer
I liked that Strafford's webinar was not too long - 1 1/2 hours is a good compromise.
Koppel, Patrick, Heybl & Dawson
The analyses of the various cases brought the subject matter together in a coherent manner.
Miles & Stockbridge
The subject-matter was engaging, well-presented and relevant.
Field Fisher Waterhouse
Intellectual Property Law Advisory Board
Winthrop & Weinstine
Fulbright & Jaworski
Winston & Strawn
Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.