Defending Class Actions Using Absent Class Member Discovery
Evaluating Whether to Seek Discovery of Putative Class Members; Leveraging Evidence at Certification, Settlement and Trial
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
Conducted on Thursday, March 2, 2017
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will prepare defense counsel to evaluate whether and how to pursue discovery of absent class members in class litigation. The panel will discuss the courts’ varying positions on permitting absent class member discovery, when to request discovery from putative class members, the type of discovery to request, how many absent class members to seek out for discovery, and strategies to leverage evidence obtained during certification, settlement and trial.
One of defense counsel’s main objectives during class certification is to identify differences between putative class members in order to demonstrate a lack of commonality and typicality within the class and ultimately defeat certification. Conducting discovery of absent or putative class members can be an effective defense tool for eliciting this information.
During settlement negotiations and trial, absent class member discovery is critical to disprove liability, injury or damages to each and every member of the class.
Courts differ on allowing absent putative class member discovery since putative class members are not official parties in the case. Defense counsel considering conducting discovery of absent class members must evaluate when to request it, whether to use depositions or written interrogatories to obtain information, and the risks of pursuing it at all.
Listen as our authoritative panel of class litigators examines current trends in seeking discovery of putative class members and considerations for defense counsel in conducting absent class member discovery, and leveraging the evidence obtained during certification, settlement and trial.
- Evaluating whether and how to seek discovery of absent class members
- When to request discovery
- Type of discovery to request
- How many absent class members to seek out for discovery
- Ethical and privilege considerations with absent class member discovery
- Leveraging evidence from putative class members during certification, settlement and trial
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- When are absent class members considered “parties” for the purpose of discovery?
- What factors should defense counsel weigh when evaluating whether and when to conduct discovery of absent class members?
- How can evidence obtained from absent class members be most effectively used during class certification, settlement and trial?
Wystan M. Ackerman, Partner
Robinson & Cole,
Mr. Ackerman is Chair of the firm's Class Action Team. He has defended major insurers across the country in class actions and has prevailed on dispositive motions in numerous cases. In addition to insurer representation, Mr. Ackerman has defended cases involving products liability, financial services, consumer contracts, and securities. He is a frequent author and lecturer on class action topics.
Andrew J. Trask, Senior Counsel
Mr. Trask has defended more than 100 class actions, involving all stages of the litigation process. While his work has concentrated on products liability and consumer fraud cases, he has also defended class actions involving telecommunications products, business contracts, securities, ERISA, the U.S. antitrust laws and environmental claims, among others. In addition to his class action practice, Mr. Trask has defended mass tort cases involving financial regulations, patent misuse cases, and government investigations into allegations of automotive defects and breach of privacy regulations.
CLE On-Demand - Streaming Video
Includes recorded streaming video of full program plus PDF handouts.
On-demand is the only recorded format recognized for CLE credits in DE, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WI.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN*, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH**, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH*, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
*Only available for attorneys admitted for more than two years. For OH CLE credits, only programs recorded within the current calendar year are eligible - contact the CLE department for verification.
**NH attendees must self-determine if a program is eligible for credit and self-report their attendance.
CLE On-Demand Video $297.00
Includes full event recording plus handouts.
Strafford is an approved provider and self-study CLE credit is available in most states.
AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KY, ME, MN, MO, MT, ND, NJ, NM, NY, OR, PA, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, WY (Note: Some states restrict CLE eligibility based on the age of a program. Refer to our state CLE Map for additional information.)
Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording.
Additional copies of a recording can be purchased at a discount. Please call Strafford Customer Service toll-free at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10 or email firstname.lastname@example.org to place your order.
Recorded Webinar Download $297.00
Recorded Audio Download (MP3) $297.00
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Strafford webinars offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
CLE Credits By State
The seminar covered an important subject with major policy implications and the speakers addressed it completely with professionalism and thorough knowledge.
Allyn Z. Lite
Lite DePalma Greenberg
The subject matter was covered in a very understandable way.
A focused presentation offering practical information in a concise format.
The speakers spoke in an understandable format with lots of examples.
Strafford's program was well organized and provided a good level of depth.
Class Action Law Advisory Board
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro
O'Melveny & Myers
Alston & Bird
Weinstein Kitchenoff & Asher
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
King & Spalding
Harvard Law School
Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10. Complaints regarding this program can be submitted via the course evaluation found in the “Thank you” e-mail at the end of the course.