Conflicts in Patent Prosecution: Avoiding the Ethical Pitfalls

Minimizing Risks of Malpractice Liability and Ethics Sanctions

A live 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with interactive Q&A

Thursday, August 26, 2021

1:00pm-2:30pm EDT, 10:00am-11:30am PDT

Early Registration Discount Deadline, Friday, July 30, 2021

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will guide IP counsel on the conflict issues that often arise in patent prosecutions. The panel will outline best practices to identify and address the risks and minimize conflicts that can lead to malpractice liability and ethical violations.


Counsel and law firms involved in patent prosecution must carefully evaluate client representations to avoid conflicts that could jeopardize clients' rights, breach fiduciary duties, and violate PTO rules, Model Rules, and state legal ethics rules. Conflicts arise when patent attorneys move between firms or develop knowledge in particular areas and seek more clients in those areas.

In 2019, the Federal Circuit granted motions to disqualify defense counsel after finding the firm had an ongoing attorney-client relationship with the plaintiff companies. The court concluded the firm's representation of the defendant presented concurrent conflicts of interest based on the terms of the fee agreement. [Dr. Falk Pharma GMBH and Salix Pharma. v. Generico (Fed. Cir. 2019)] The case serves as a reminder of the challenges in predicting conflicts and the importance of addressing such conflicts when they arise.

In addition to these contractual conflicts of interest, patent prosecutors must also identify and address risks related to the subject matter, client confidentiality, and other troublesome situations such as employers and investors with adverse interests.

Listen as our authoritative panel of IP counsel examines the issues of the conflicts that arise in patent prosecutions and outlines best practices for identifying, addressing, and minimizing the potential risks and liability of such conflicts of interest.



  1. Rules governing conflicts
    1. PTO rules
    2. Model Rules
    3. State ethics rules
    4. Fiduciary duties
  2. Identifying conflict: when do they arise
    1. Adverse or potentially adverse representations to other current or former clients
    2. Representations substantially related to work for previous clients
  3. Screening
    1. Monitor
    2. Blocking new client/matter that would raise conflict
    3. Prospective consent
    4. Detecting conflicts that arise later
    5. What to do when screens fail
    6. Cautionary tales
  4. Best practices
    1. Pre-conflict planning
    2. Risk management
    3. Resolving conflicts when they arise


The panel will review these and other critical issues:

  • What policies and practices should counsel have in place to identify potential conflicts in patent prosecutions?
  • What steps can patent prosecutors take to minimize the risk of subject matter conflicts?
  • How should patent counsel respond after identifying conflicts?


Schreiner, Stephen
Stephen T. Schreiner

Carmichael IP

Mr. Schreiner focuses on all aspects of intellectual property law, including: patent litigation, inter partes reviews...  |  Read More

Additional faculty
to be announced.
Attend on August 26

Early Discount (through 07/30/21)

Cannot Attend August 26?

Early Discount (through 07/30/21)

You may pre-order a recording to listen at your convenience. Recordings are available 48 hours after the webinar. Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video