CAFA Removal and Remand: Key Developments for Plaintiff and Defense Counsel

Lessons from Recent Cases on Amount-in-Controversy, State AG Suits, Joint Trials and More

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A


Conducted on Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926
Program Materials

This CLE webinar will examine key recent developments in Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) removal and remand, analyze the impact of recent cases for class action practitioners, and offer strategies for plaintiff and defense counsel for obtaining or defeating removal or remand.

Description

Courts issued a number of rulings on the issue of removal under the CAFA throughout 2013 and 2014, including multiple U.S. Supreme Court opinions. On Dec. 15, 2014, in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. LLC v. Owens, the High Court held a defendant must only include a “plausible allegation” in its notice of removal to satisfy CAFA’s $5 million amount-in-controversy requirement. While the decision is favorable to defendants, defense counsel must still be prepared to present evidence supporting federal jurisdiction if the plaintiff challenges a request for removal.

Other recent CAFA decisions have addressed the circumstances under which cases that are proposed to be heard as a joint trial are subject to federal jurisdiction and removal under CAFA’s “mass action” provision, and whether a state attorney general’s parens patriae lawsuit is a “mass action” eligible for removal to federal court.

In addition, some courts still wrestle with the effect of post-removal events such as denial of class certification or loss of diversity on continued federal court jurisdiction.

Listen as our authoritative panel of class action attorneys examines the latest case law addressing CAFA removal and remand and key takeaways for class action litigators.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Case law developments on CAFA removal
  2. Defense strategies to obtain removal and defeat remand
  3. Plaintiff strategies to defeat removal or obtain remand

Benefits

The panel will address these and other key issues:

  • How have recent Supreme Court and Circuit Court of Appeals cases addressed CAFA removal standards?
  • Do federal courts retain jurisdiction even after class certification is denied or diversity is destroyed?
  • What post-removal events or circumstances can result in a remand to state court?
  • Can attorney general cases ever be removed to federal court?

  • Do plaintiffs need to put forward evidence to rebut a defendant’s amount-in-controversy argument?

  • Does the Supreme Court’s Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. LLC v. Owens ruling extend beyond CAFA cases?

Faculty

Jeffrey A. Holmstrand
Jeffrey A. Holmstrand

Senior Counsel
Flaherty Sensabaugh Bonasso

Mr. Holmstrand focuses his state-wide practice on defending products liability, mass torts/class action and...  |  Read More

Allan Kanner
Allan Kanner

Founder
Kanner and Whiteley

Mr. Kanner has acquired a national reputation in the fields of complex litigation, environmental law and consumer...  |  Read More

Jessica D. Miller
Jessica D. Miller

Partner
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom

Ms. Miller has broad experience in the defense of purported class actions and other complex civil litigation with a...  |  Read More

Other Formats
— Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include program handouts. To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

$297

Download

$297