Patent Threats: Initial Response Strategies

Evaluating Patent Defenses When Faced With a Notice Letter or Complaint

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar/teleconference with Q&A


Conducted on Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Recorded event now available


This CLE webinar will provide guidance for IP counsel to identify inherent defects in a patent, find prior art and potential inequitable conduct without a “scorched earth” search, and formulate other defenses using time and cost-effective methods.

Description

The first several hours after receiving a notice letter or being served with a complaint are critically important for companies and their counsel. This is the most valuable period to develop good defenses quickly.

Counsel must evaluate the patent threat and determine the most viable defenses and arguments to achieve the client's goals and defeat a patent threat—and quickly gather ammunition for use in a pre-litigation discussion or in drafting an answer to a complaint.

The key to success is understanding the techniques and strategies to improving the position of an accused infringer in a patent case or pre-litigation in a manner that is both time and cost efficient.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent litigators examines tactics for identifying inherent defects in the patent, finding prior art and potential inequitable conduct without a “scorched earth” search, and formulating other defenses in a cost-effective way. They will provide a practical checklist with steps to take when facing a patent threat.

Outline

  1. Ascertaining the threat
    1. The patent holder and its counsel
    2. The judge and forum
    3. Possibility of an injunction
    4. Products potentially at risk
  2. Identifying inherent defects in the patent
    1. Assignments/ownership
    2. Maintenance fees
    3. Small entity status
    4. Written description
    5. Indefiniteness
  3. Finding prior art and evidence of inequitable conduct
    1. Prior art that inventors or prosecuting attorney knew about
    2. Other sources of easily-found prior art
  4. Identifying other defenses
    1. Waiver
    2. Implied licenses/ exhaustion
    3. Laches
    4. Standards

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key questions:

  • How can counsel quickly gather ammunition for use in a pre-litigation conversation with a patent holder who has sent a patent notice letter?
  • Once a lawsuit has been filed, which defenses are “low-hanging fruit” that can be formulated and supported with evidence quickly and cheaply?
  • What strategies can counsel employ to develop strong defenses in a short amount of time?

Faculty

Brent K. Yamashita, Partner
DLA Piper US, East Palo Alto, Calif.

He is a patent litigator, with experience in computer hardware and software, hard disk drive, optical drive, storage systems, communication and mobile device technologies. He also prepares and prosecutes patents and reexamination petitions and regularly advises companies on IP issues.

Dr. Marc D. Peters, Partner
Morrison & Foerster, Palo Alto, Calif.

He focuses on representing clients in litigation and counseling involving electronics, semiconductor, and computer-related technologies. His experience also includes representing clients in a variety of industries and in trade secret, antitrust, copyright, and trademark matters.

Lisa Launer, Director and Associate General Counsel
Logitech, Fremont, Calif.

She is responsible for worldwide Intellectual Property litigation for Logitech Inc. and its affiliated foreign entities around the world. She is also a collaborator on worldwide patent strategy.

Ordering

Online CLE - Audio Recording

Includes streaming audio of full program plus handouts (available 24 hours after live program).

CLE: Pre-approved for participatory or non-traditional/alternate format credit in: CA, HI*, NY*, WV*. Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, FL, GA, MO, MT, TX*, VT, WA.
Upon request, also available in: CO, CT*, ID, KY, LA*, ME, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR*, SC, TN, UT, WI, WY. If you are applying for credit in one of these states, make sure to select those states when placing your order.
(*Indicates that Strafford must report attendance.)

Online CLE Audio $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?


Recorded Event

Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, CA, CT, FL, GA, HI, MO, MT, NY, TX*, VT, WA, WV. Upon request, self-study credit is also available in: CO, ID*, KY, ME, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR, UT, WI, WY. If you are applying for self-study credit in one of these states, contact Strafford CLE at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com. (*Indicates that Strafford needs to process the CLE — see below to purchase this option.)

Webinar Download (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00
Available three business days after the live event

How does this work?

DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

MP3 Download (Audio with Slide PDFs) $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?

CD (Audio with Slide PDFs) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

Webinar/Teleconference

Strafford webinars/teleconferences offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program).  Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

or call 1-800-926-7926

CLE Credit

Strafford's live seminars qualify for CLE in every state that accredits webinars. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.

More Details >

or call 1-800-926-7926

Customer Reviews

Strafford’s program provided a good 'how to' checklist of common defenses to consider when a patent is asserted.

Justin A. Jernigan

Summa, Additon & Ashe

I liked the practical insights, particularly when tied to cases the presenters had worked on.

Michael Gray

Kohler

Strafford provided an enthusiastic presentation that focused on patent practice, not theory.

David H. Vance

Vance Intellectual Property

I liked the topic and the tools provided in the handouts.

Mildred Johnson

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

The program gave me in-depth information that I was completely unfamiliar with.

Amy Epton

Whitfield, McGann & Ketterman

or call 1-800-926-7926

Intellectual Property Law Advisory Board

Stephen R. Baird

Shareholder

Winthrop & Weinstine

Charles S. Baker

Partner

Fulbright & Jaworski

David S. Bloch

Partner

Winston & Strawn

Hung H. Bui

Partner

Bui Garcia-Zamor

Irah H. Donner

Partner

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan

Ian N. Feinberg

Partner

Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson

Anthony J. Fitzpatrick

Partner

Duane Morris

Bassam N. Ibrahim

Shareholder

Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney

Craig P. Opperman

Partner

DLA Piper

David Segal

Senior IP Counsel

Intel

Jeffrey R. Seul

Partner

Holland + Knight

Astrid R. Spain

Partner

Jones Day

Mark P. Wine

Partner

Orrick

or call 1-800-926-7926

Our Guarantee

Strafford webinars and teleconferences are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10.