Truncated Rule of Reason Analysis in Antitrust Representations

Strategies for Applying the Test Following the FTC’s Realcomp II Decision

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar/teleconference with Q&A


Conducted on Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Recorded event now available


This CLE webinar will provide guidance to counsel for companies involved in competitor collaborations or Section 1 investigations for applying the truncated rule of reason analysis, including the plaintiffs' burden of proof and available defenses.

Description

The Federal Trade Commission’s recent decision in Realcomp II has put the spotlight on the truncated rule of reason analysis. The decision significantly expands the scope of practices that are deemed inherently suspect and limits the justifications permitted for such practices.

Courts have been unclear and inconsistent in identifying when the truncated rule of reason analysis can be used. The new landscape created by the Realcomp II decision only makes it more difficult to determine when and where the truncated rule of reason analysis is appropriate.

Companies and counsel must understand the application of the truncated rule of reason analysis framework in the establishment of a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, the burden of proof required of plaintiffs and effective defense strategies.

Listen as our authoritative panel of antitrust attorneys examines when the truncated rule of reason analysis applies, how courts and agencies have treated the analysis, and the expanded scope of the inherently suspect analysis. The panel will explain best practices for dealing with the rule of reason analysis, including what plaintiffs need to prove, available defenses, and the impact on joint ventures.

Outline

  1. Truncated rule of reason
    1. Application
    2. Treatment
  2. Expanded scope of inherently suspect analysis
    1. How Realcomp expanded what is inherently suspect
    2. Challenges posed for organizations in competitor collaborations
    3. Responding to those challenges
  3. Dealing with rule of reason analysis
    1. What plaintiffs need to prove
    2. Defenses
    3. Impact on joint ventures

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key questions:

  • When is application of the truncated rule of reason analysis appropriate? How are the courts and agencies treating the analysis?
  • How has the scope of the inherently suspect analysis been expanded?
  • What must a plaintiff prove in the truncated analysis and what defenses are available?

Faculty

Geoffrey D. Oliver, Partner
Jones Day, Washington, D.C.

He focuses on antitrust matters, with emphasis on government merger and conduct investigations and on litigation and counseling with respect to matters involving antitrust and patent law. He served at the FTC as the Assistant Director responsible for the Anticompetitive Practices Division. He also participated in policy initiatives involving standard-setting, intellectual property and other issues.

David L. Meyer, Partner
Morrison & Foerster, Washington, D.C.

He co-chairs the firm's Global Antitrust and Competition Law Practice Group. He served most recently as the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and prior to that as the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Enforcement, where he was responsible for civil investigations and merger reviews in a wide range of industries.

Ordering

Online CLE - Audio Recording

Includes audio streaming of full program plus handouts (available 24 hours after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for participatory or non-traditional/alternate format credit in: CA, HI*, NY*, WV*. Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, GA, MO, MT, TX, VT, WA.
Upon request, also available in: CO, CT*, FL, ID, KY, LA*, ME, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR*, SC, TN, UT, WI*, WY. If you are applying for credit in one of these states, make sure to select those states when placing your order.
(*Indicates that Strafford must report attendance.)

Online CLE Audio $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?


Recorded Event

Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, CA, CT, GA, HI, MO, MT, NY, TX, VT, WA, WV. Upon request, self-study credit is also available in: CO, FL, ID, KY, ME, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR, UT, WI, WY. If you are applying for self-study credit in one of these states, contact Strafford CLE at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.

Webinar Download (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00
Available three business days after the live event

How does this work?

DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

MP3 Download (Audio with Slide PDFs) $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?

CD (Audio with Slide PDFs) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

Webinar/Teleconference

Strafford webinars/teleconferences offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program).  Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

Can't Attend the Live Program?

CLE Credit

Strafford's live seminars qualify for CLE in every state that accredits webinars. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.

More Details >

Customer Reviews

High quality content, good speakers, and convenient to do over the web.

Ed Moomjian

Udall Law Firm

Content was excellent.

Jonelle Burnham

Kimberly-Clark

All of the speakers had a wide range of knowledge.

Kimberly Hayes

General Mills

The information was relevant and well presented.  The questions were good, and the speakers responded with clear knowledge.

Sheila Fox Morrison

Davis Wright Tremaine

I found the content very useful and was impressed by the high quality of each speaker's ability to articulate his presentation.

Andrew Lillie

Hogan & Hartson

Antitrust Law Advisory Board

Clifford H. Aronson

Partner

Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom

Tyler A. Baker

Partner

Fenwick & West

Gregory J. Casas

Shareholder

Greenberg Traurig

David B. Goroff

Partner

Foley & Lardner

Christopher J. Kelly

Partner

Mayer Brown

James J. Long

Shareholder

Briggs and Morgan

Janet L. McDavid

Partner

Hogan Lovells

Kevin D. McDonald

Partner

Jones Day

Daniel F. McInnis

Partner

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld

Saul P. Morgenstern

Partner

Kaye Scholer

M. Sean Royall

Partner

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher

Our Guarantee

Strafford webinars and teleconferences are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10.