Patent Marking: Federal Circuit Expands Liability Threat

Complying With the False Marking Statute to Avoid Claims

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar/teleconference with Q&A


Conducted on Thursday, March 18, 2010
Recorded event now available


This CLE webinar will provide guidance to patent attorneys on deciding when and whether to mark items as patented since the Federal Circuit's Forest Group decision expanded liability for mismarking patents. The panel will offer best practices for marking patented items and for minimizing liability risks.

Description

In its recent decision in Forest Group v. Bon Tool, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals expanded patentee liability for mismarking patents. The Federal Circuit adopted a per article interpretation of "offense" creating the potential for significant damages.

Deciding whether or not to mark articles as patented and complying with the False Marking Statute are not cut and dried. False patent marking can occur under a variety of circumstances, and anyone may sue for the alleged mismarking of an unpatented item.

Since the Forest Group ruling, Bayer, Graco, BIC and others have been sued, and more suits are expected as plaintiffs seek to take advantage of the ruling. Companies and counsel must carefully weigh the costs and benefits of enforcing patents in deciding whether to mark the patented item.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys examines the requirements for patent marking and recent court treatment of marking. The panel will discuss the analysis of whether to mark, how to mark, and how to minimize the risk of liability for false marking.

Outline

  1. Patent marking requirements
  2. Court treatment
    1. Forest Group v. Bon Tool (Fed. Cir. 2009)
    2. Matthew A. Pequignot v. Solo Cup Co. (E.D. Va. 2009)
  3. Patent marking
    1. Determining whether to mark — considerations
    2. How to mark
  4. Minimizing risk of liability for false marking

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key questions:

  • What factors must be considered when determining whether to mark a patented item?
  • How are the federal courts treating claims that allege false marking?
  • What steps can companies and their counsel take to minimize and mitigate the risks associated with false marking?

Faculty

Nathan Cummings, Partner
Cooley Godward Kronish, Reston, Va.

He focuses on intellectual property litigation, with a particular emphasis on patent litigation. He counsels high-technology clients in all aspects of patent matters, including patent procurement, licensing, infringement, validity, enforceability and patent portfolio analysis.

Robert W. Unikel, Partner
Howrey, Chicago

He litigates complex patent cases, as well as cases involving trade secrets, trademarks, trade dress and other forms of intellectual property. He has successfully defended against claims of false patent marking under 35 U.S.C. §292; and has managed disputes involving various well-known trademarks and myriad trade dress implicating product and packaging designs and non-traditional source indicators.

Ordering

Online CLE - Audio Recording

Includes audio streaming of full program plus handouts (available 24 hours after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for participatory or non-traditional/alternate format credit in: CA, HI*, NY*, WV*. Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, MO, MT, TX, VT, WA.
Upon request, also available in: CO, CT*, FL, GA, ID, KY, LA, ME, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR*, SC, TN, UT, WI*, WY. If you are applying for credit in one of these states, make sure to select those states when placing your order.
(*Indicates that Strafford must report attendance.)

Online CLE Audio $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?


Recorded Event

Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, CA, CT, HI, MO, MT, NY, TX, VT, WA, WV. Upon request, self-study credit is also available in: CO, FL, GA, ID, KY, ME, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR, UT, WI, WY. If you are applying for self-study credit in one of these states, contact Strafford CLE at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.

MP3 Download (Audio with Slide PDFs) $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?

Webinar Download (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00
Available three business days after the live event

How does this work?

CD (Audio with Slide PDFs) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

Webinar/Teleconference

Strafford webinars/teleconferences offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program).  Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

CLE Credit

Strafford's live seminars qualify for CLE in every state that accredits webinars. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.

More Details>

Customer Reviews

I attend a lot of these lectures and Strafford's presentation addressed important issues I rarely hear about. I really learned something for a change.

Rebekah J. Poston

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey

Very good.  Gave me exactly what I wanted.  The questions I emailed in were handled thoroughly.

James J. Long

Briggs & Morgan

The speaker's practical discussions were particularly helpful.

Kenneth J. Clarkson

Sullivan, Ward, Asher & Patton

A thoroughly professionally structured and presented program.

Roy Gowey

City of Coeur d'Alene

The speakers included a significant number of best practices, which are critical to application of the law.

Deirdre J. Kamber

Fitzpatrick Lentz & Bubba

Intellectual Property Law Advisory Board

Stephen R. Baird

Shareholder

Winthrop & Weinstine

Charles S. Baker

Partner

Fulbright & Jaworski

David S. Bloch

Partner

Winston & Strawn

Hung H. Bui

Partner

Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus

Ian N. Feinberg

Partner

Mayer Brown

Anthony J. Fitzpatrick

Partner

Duane Morris

Craig P. Opperman

Partner

Reed Smith

David Segal

Partner

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher

Jeffrey R. Seul

Partner

Holland + Knight

Astrid R. Spain

Partner

McDermott Will & Emery

Mark P. Wine

Partner

Orrick