Patenting Green Technologies

Crafting Patent Claims for Clean Energy Innovations

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar/teleconference with Q&A


Conducted on Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Recorded event now available


This CLE webinar will discuss developing patent applications for environmental technology claims to meet patentability requirements and will outline best practices for enforcing IP rights.

Description

Green technology patents are surging — from energy-saving devices and alternative energy production to emissions-reduction trading methods. Companies and counsel must carefully craft patent applications to secure rights to green inventions.

While environmental innovations may have no difficulty meeting eligibility and utility requirements for patentability, many inventions encounter hurdles in meeting the novelty and non-obviousness requirements. Counsel can proactively plan to overcome these challenges.

With companies vying to be first with green products, companies and counsel should also accelerate prosecution of green inventions in order to speed up issuance of a patent. Counsel must have a thorough understanding of the process and how to direct claims.

Listen as our panel of patent attorneys examines key issues in writing a patent related to green technology, discusses how to overcome obstacles in meeting novelty and non-obviousness requirements, and offers strategies to accelerate prosecution and to enforce IP rights.

Outline

  1. Writing a patent and claiming to be green
    A. Issues to consider
    B. Invention design to meet and/or define regulations
    C. Patents relating to new materials and repurposed materials
    D. Improved energy efficiency
  2. Accelerating prosecution of green inventions
    A. Petition to Make Special
    B. Peer to patent review
  3. Enforcement strategies
    A. Licensing
    B. Policing patent
    C. Litigation

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key questions:

  • What subject matter should be protected by a patent application for sustainable technology inventions?
  • What steps can companies and counsel take to expedite the application process?
  • What are the key strategies for companies and counsel seeking to protect green innovations?

Faculty

Dr. Michael R. Ward, Partner
Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, Calif.

His patent practice covers various technologies and aspects of patent law related to small molecules, protein therapeutics, pharmaceuticals, nuclear transfer cloning, and gene therapy, among others. His counseling work includes management and development of offensive and defensive patent portfolios, assessment and evaluation of patent infringement and validity issues.

Paul Davis, Partner
Goodwin Procter, Menlo Park, Calif.

He has a strong patent background in the medical device, electrical engineering, photonics, networking, e-commerce and telecommunication industries, focusing primarily on U.S., international and national phase patent prosecution and strategic counseling services. He has significant experience in litigating intellectual property issues for information technology companies.

Victor A. Cardona, Partner
Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti, Albany, N.Y.

He is experienced in enforcing and procuring protection for patents, trademarks and copyrights. He co-chairs the firm's Cleantech Practice Group. He served as an Environmental Engineer with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation where he evaluated the feasibility, effectiveness and implementation of environmental remediation technologies.

Ordering

Online CLE - Audio Recording

Includes audio streaming of full program plus handouts (available 24 hours after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for participatory or non-traditional/alternate format credit in: CA, HI*, NY*, WV*. Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, MO, MT, TX, VT, WA.
Upon request, also available in: CO, CT*, FL, GA, ID, KY, LA, ME, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR*, SC, TN, UT, WI*, WY. If you are applying for credit in one of these states, make sure to select those states when placing your order.
(*Indicates that Strafford must report attendance.)

Online CLE Audio $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?


Recorded Event

Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, CA, CT, HI, MO, MT, NY, TX, VT, WA, WV. Upon request, self-study credit is also available in: CO, FL, GA, ID, KY, ME, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR, UT, WI, WY. If you are applying for self-study credit in one of these states, contact Strafford CLE at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.

MP3 Download (Audio Only) $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?

Webinar Download (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00
Available three business days after the live event

How does this work?

CD (Audio Only) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

Webinar/Teleconference

Strafford webinars/teleconferences offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program).  Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

CLE Credit

Strafford's live seminars qualify for CLE in every state that accredits webinars. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.

More Details>

Customer Reviews

Very convenient, quick and thorough, with no wasted time.

James O'Gallagher

Kopka Pinkus Dolin Eads

All of the speakers were very informative, and being able to ask questions was very helpful.

Larry V. Smith

Jackson Walker

Cutting edge information from people who are in the field.

John McGowan

Donahue Tucker & Ciandella

The information was relevant and well presented.  The questions were good, and the speakers responded with clear knowledge.

Sheila Fox Morrison

Davis Wright Tremaine

This was my first experience with an interactive CLE.  It was good not to have to leave my office for the program.

Patricia Hays

Vestcom International

Intellectual Property Law Advisory Board

Stephen R. Baird

Shareholder

Winthrop & Weinstine

Charles S. Baker

Partner

Fulbright & Jaworski

David S. Bloch

Partner

Winston & Strawn

Hung H. Bui

Partner

Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus

Ian N. Feinberg

Partner

Mayer Brown

Anthony J. Fitzpatrick

Partner

Duane Morris

Craig P. Opperman

Partner

Reed Smith

David Segal

Partner

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher

Jeffrey R. Seul

Partner

Holland + Knight

Astrid R. Spain

Partner

McDermott Will & Emery

Mark P. Wine

Partner

Orrick