Attorney–Client Privilege in IP Due Diligence

Strategies for Preserving Confidential Communications in IP Asset Transfers

Recording of a 90-minute CLE teleconference with Q&A


Conducted on Thursday, August 28, 2008
Recorded event now available


Description

Intellectual property due diligence is critical in many business transactions as the value of IP assets are increasing. Due diligence also presents significant risks for IP owners who are called upon to share confidential and privileged information.

IP owners must carefully consider whether and what privileged information to disclose during a due diligence process. If a deal falls through, disclosing too much privileged information will have far-reaching implications.

Achieving the proper balance of disclosure requires careful forethought and a thorough understanding of the impact of the attorney–client privilege in the due diligence process.

Listen as our authoritative panel of IP law specialists provides their experienced perspectives on when, what and how much to disclose during due diligence, protecting confidential information during the process — and if the deal falls through, best practices for protecting the privilege.

Outline

  1. Information sharing — to do or not to do (and how much)
    1. Assessing the risk of waiving the privilege against the need to provide information as close the deal
    2. What privileged information should be disclosed
    3. When should privileged information be disclosed
    4. Who should or will have access to privileged information/documents
    5. Under what circumstances is privilege considered waived when the documents are shared
    6. Ethical duties to disclose information
  2. Protecting privileged and confidential information during due diligence
    1. Common interest agreements
    2. Confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements
    3. Use of third-party to provide documents
    4. Privileged communication — written v. verbal
    5. Shielding trade secrets
    6. Privacy concerns and complying with obligations to protect confidential personally identifiable private information
  3. Waiver
    1. Common interest doctrine
    2. Court treatment
    3. Avoiding inadvertent waiver
  4. If the deal falls through — protecting privileged and confidential information
    1. Information on a need-to-know basis
    2. Controlled release of information

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key questions:

  • What privileged information should be disclosed during due diligence — and what is the best timing for disclosure?
  • Under what circumstances are privileges considered waived when the documents are shared?
  • What steps can a company and counsel take to protect privileged and confidential information during due diligence?
  • If a business transaction terminates during due diligence, what can IP owners do to protect privileged information that has already been disclosed?

Faculty

Stephen T. Schreiner, Partner
Goodwin Procter, Washington, D.C.

He focuses on all aspects of intellectual property law including patent litigation, patent prosecution, counseling and due diligence related to electronics, software, e-commerce, and business methods.

Steven J. Frank, Partner
Goodwin Procter, Boston

He advises clients in all areas of intellectual property law and has significant experience with IP diligence. He also negotiates domestic and cross-border licenses and technology-transfer agreements. He focuses on patent prosecution, analysis of infringement and related issues, and the drafting and negotiation of agreements relating to the transfer or license of intellectual property.

Hope D. Mehlman, Associate General Counsel
Regions Financial Corporation, Birmingham, Ala.

She advises on legal issues relating to intellectual property, information security and threat assessment, phishing, fraud prevention and remediation efforts, and corporate governance.

Ordering

Online CLE

Includes audio streaming of full program plus handouts (available 24 hours after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for participatory or non-traditional/alternate format credit in: CA, HI*, NY*, WV*. Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, MO, MT, TX, VT, WA.
Upon request, also available in: CO, CT*, FL, GA, ID, KY, LA, ME, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR*, SC, TN, UT, WI*, WY. If you are applying for credit in one of these states, make sure to select those states when placing your order.
(*Indicates that Strafford must report attendance.)

Online CLE Audio $149.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?


Recorded Event

Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, CA, CT, HI, MO, MT, NY, TX, VT, WA, WV. Upon request, self-study credit is also available in: CO, FL, GA, ID, KY, ME, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR, UT, WI, WY. If you are applying for self-study credit in one of these states, contact Strafford CLE at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.

MP3 Download (Audio Only) $49.00
Available 24 hours after the live event

How does this work?

CD $49.00 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

CLE Credit

Strafford's live seminars qualify for CLE in every state that accredits webinars. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.

More Details>

Customer Reviews

Content was superb.

Patrick Webb

Webb & Carey

The program provided good legal references, good bullet points and good scope.

Tim Thomas

Kolesar & Leatham

All of the speakers had a wide range of knowledge.

Kimberly Hayes

General Mills

The best teleconference I have experienced — bar none.  Well done in every respect.

Jake Jacobson

Osborne Construction Co.

Each speaker's topic was distinct. The written materials were also excellent and contained useful information and tips.

Una Kang

Saiber

Intellectual Property Law Advisory Board

Stephen R. Baird

Shareholder

Winthrop & Weinstine

Charles S. Baker

Partner

Fulbright & Jaworski

David S. Bloch

Partner

Winston & Strawn

Hung H. Bui

Partner

Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus

Ian N. Feinberg

Partner

Mayer Brown

Anthony J. Fitzpatrick

Partner

Duane Morris

Craig P. Opperman

Partner

Reed Smith

David Segal

Partner

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher

Jeffrey R. Seul

Partner

Holland + Knight

Astrid R. Spain

Partner

McDermott Will & Emery

Mark P. Wine

Partner

Orrick