Bundled Discounts: Emerging Antitrust Challenges
Avoiding Anticompetitive Conduct in an Uncertan Legal Envrionment
CD/DVD of a 90-minute CLE teleconference with Q&A
Conducted on Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Now available on CD/DVD
Description
In Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth, the Ninth Circuit adopted a new standard for bundled discounts and established a split between it and Third Circuit (LePage v. 3M) in analyzing bundled discounts. This leaves the treatment of bundled discounts unclear.
The district courts' approaches to bundled discounts have also been inconsistent and have not applied a consistent test to determine whether anti-competitive conduct has occurred. This further heightens the confusion for business.
In its 2007 report, the Antitrust Modernization Commission noted that Sherman Act Section 2 standards are not fully developed, particularly with respect to bundling, and there is a need for additional clarity of the standards. In Europe, the antitrust treatment on bundling is similarly in flux.
Listen as our panel of antitrust specialists examines the state of the law and recent developments regarding bundling. The panelists will discuss and derive insights regarding how antitrust enforcement agencies may view bundling, how the U.S. and E.U. approaches compare, and how to avoid, or at least anticipate, antitrust challenges.
Outline
- Background to Antitrust Analysis of Bundling
- Brief Statutory Overview
- Recent Decisions and Divergence in Standards
- LePage’s
- PeaceHealth
- Perspectives from an Antitrust Division official
- Comments on Agency approach to bundling issues
- Illustration of how ubiquitous bundling is — healthcare networks
- Bundling in the European Union
- Current Issues and Controversies
- Comparison to the U.S. approach
- Counseling on Bundling
- Steering clear of trouble
- Red flags
- Intellectual Property developments
Benefits
The panel reviewed these and other key questions:
- What business conduct is permissible in offering bundled discounts?
- How does discounting a range of products put a company at risk of violating antitrust laws?
- How should price be measured in the multi-product discount context?
- What practices should defense counsel use to negotiate settlement agreements that are fair and reasonable to their clients — and avoid costly and time-consuming litigation?
Faculty
Mark J. Botti,
Partner
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Washington, D.C.
He focuses on antitrust matters and has extensive experience involving the antitrust review of mergers and acquisitions. While at the Department of Justice, he litigated complex antitrust claims.
Joseph M. Miller,
Assistant Chief of the Litigation I Section, Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
He oversees civil investigations in a wide range of industries, including insurance, healthcare and consumer products.
Mats Johnsson,
Partner
Ashurst, Brussels, Belgium
He specializes in all aspects of EC and Swedish competition law. He focuses on cases dealing with cartels and abuse of dominant position.
Ordering
Teleconference on CD
Purchase a CD of the full event proceedings, including Q&A and PDF files of all handouts (available 10 days after the seminar).
For CLE only, this program is pre-approved for self-study credit in AK, AZ, CA, MO, MT, VT, WV.
Self-study CLE credits are also available in CT*, CO, GA, ID, KY, LA, ME, NV, ND, NY*, OR, TX, UT, WA, WI, WY.
Please call us if you will be self-reporting in one of these states. *For CT and NY, Strafford needs to process the CLE — see below to purchase this option
Self-study CPE is not offered on CD purchases.
CD $297.00 plus $9.45 S&H
CLE Processing on CD/DVD (NY and CT Only)
CLE processing for listening to the CD/DVD is available for an additional $65 per person per state in NY and CT.
CLE on CD Processing $65.00
CLE Credit
Strafford seminars qualify for CLE credits in every state that accredits teleconferences. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.
Customer Reviews
The information was relevant and well presented. The questions were good, and the speakers responded with clear knowledge.
Sheila Fox Morrison
Davis Wright Tremaine
I liked the different speaker perspectives.
Gina Fama
Standard Chartered Bank
Cutting edge information from people who are in the field.
John McGowan
Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
Speakers demonstrated thorough subject matter knowledge.
Jodi Plagenz
Deere & Co.
The three presentations created a balanced approach.
Cris Navarro
Enloe Medical Center
Antitrust Law Advisory Board
Partner
Fenwick & West
Shareholder
Greenberg Traurig
Partner
Hogan & Hartson
Partner
Foley & Lardner
Partner
Mayer Brown
Partner
Jones Day
Partner
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
Partner
Kaye Scholer
Partner
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher