Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics
IP License Strategies after Court's Unanimous Ruling on Patent Exhaustion
Recording of a 90-minute CLE teleconference with Q&A
Conducted on Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Recorded event now available
Description
On June 9, in Quanta Computer Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court once again reversed the Federal Circuit on an issue involving patent owners' rights, continuing the Court's recent inclination toward limiting the scope of patent rights.
The Court's ruling firmly rejected the Federal Circuit’s departure from the doctrine of patent exhaustion enunciated almost 150 years ago: that the authorized sale or disposition of a patented article exhausts a patent owner's right to that article and such exhaustion cannot be "contracted around."
The Court further reversed the Federal Circuit in ruling that the patent exhaustion doctrine does apply to method claims. The Court also discussed "reasonable use" of a patented product and "essential features" of a patent claim, both highly relevant issues in exhaustion arguments.
Listen as our authoritative panel of IP attorneys provides an overview and analysis of the Court's decision from both the patent owner and licensor's perspective, including the likely impact of Quanta on future IP licensing arrangements. The panel will provide their perspectives on how IP owners and licensors can protect their rights through patent, as well as contract, law.
Outline
- Patent exhaustion
- Brief review of past Supreme Court precedent
- Federal Circuit departure from Supreme Court in recent years
- Quanta Computer Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc.
- Brief overview of facts
- Lower court rulings
- Supreme Court ruling
- The impact
- On existing licensing agreements
- Recourse for companies that paid royalties?
- Patent exhaustion for downstream transactions
- Patents for methods or processes — what does the ruling mean for them? Does it give a picture of what the future may hold?
- What issues of patent exhaustion remain open after Quanta?
- Where do we go from here?
- How should those entering licensing agreements adjust their strategy?
- What should existing patent holders do?
- How can IP owners and licensors protect their rights through patent law?
- How can IP owners and licensors protect their rights through contract law?
Benefits
The panel reviewed these and other key questions:
- What methods remain available to patent owners to enforce their patents against downstream purchasers and users?
- Although patent exhaustion can't be "contracted around," are remedies available to patentees under conditional licenses or other contract law theories?
- What are the best practices for patent owners and licensees to ensure that current and future licensing arrangements incorporate the lessons of Quanta?
Faculty
Allen E. Hoover,
Partner
Banner & Witcoff, Chicago
He has substantial experience in intellectual property law. His licensing experience includes negotiations, transaction structuring, due diligence investigations, and client counseling.
Patricia A. Millett,
Partner
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Washington, D.C.
She co-heads the firm's Supreme Court Practice and has argued 26 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. She filed a brief in the Quanta case.
Richard P. Gilly,
Partner
Winston & Strawn, Washington, D.C.
He focuses his practice in intellectual property counseling and litigation. He drafts and negotiates IP licenses and agreements and counsels on strategic intellectual property and business issues.
Ordering
Online CLE
Includes audio streaming of full program plus handouts (available 24 hours after live seminar).
CLE:
Pre-approved for participatory or non-traditional/alternate format credit in: CA, HI*, NY*, WV*.
Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, MO, MT, TX, VT, WA.
Upon request, also available in: CO, CT*, FL, GA, ID, KY, LA, ME, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR*, SC, TN, UT, WI*, WY. If you are applying for credit in one of these states, make sure to select those states when placing your order.
(*Indicates that Strafford must report attendance.)
Online CLE Audio $149.00
Available 24 hours after the live event
Recorded Event
Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live seminar).
CLE: Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, CA, CT, HI, MO, MT, NY, TX, VT, WA, WV. Upon request, self-study credit is also available in: CO, FL, GA, ID, KY, ME, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR, UT, WI, WY. If you are applying for self-study credit in one of these states, contact Strafford CLE at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.
MP3 Download (Audio Only) $49.00
Available 24 hours after the live event
CD $49.00
plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event
CLE Credit
Strafford's live seminars qualify for CLE in every state that accredits webinars. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.
Customer Reviews
The program provided good legal references, good bullet points and good scope.
Tim Thomas
Kolesar & Leatham
The speaker's practical discussions were particularly helpful.
Kenneth J. Clarkson
Sullivan, Ward, Asher & Patton
Very informative — one of the best run programs in a plethora of on-line offerings.
Jeff Michelman
Stinson Morrison Hecker
Very concise - provided what was needed, yet also included many examples, thoughts and ideas.
Ron Keith
Skilled Care
Tremendous program. Exceeded my expectations. Gave me things to consider that I had not previously thought about.
Bruce Henderson
Phelps Jenkins Gibson & Fowler
Intellectual Property Law Advisory Board
Shareholder
Winthrop & Weinstine
Partner
Fulbright & Jaworski
Partner
Winston & Strawn
Partner
Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus
Partner
Mayer Brown
Partner
Duane Morris
Partner
Reed Smith
Partner
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
Partner
Holland + Knight
Partner
McDermott Will & Emery
Partner
Orrick