Information Sharing by Competitors: Minimizing Antitrust Liability
Avoiding Gun-Jumping in Mergers and Competitor Collaborations
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar/teleconference with Q&A
Conducted on Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Recorded event now available
This CLE webinar will review antitrust violations that can arise when competitors share information either related to a joint venture or collaboration or when considering a merger. The panel will offer insights and guidance from a recent federal court ruling and government enforcement activity.
Description
The substance and extent of information that can be shared between companies in competitor transactions is an area of serious concern and uncertainty for businesses. Until recently, courts have offered little guidance for businesses engaged in or considering competitor ventures.
However, in Jan. 2009, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois set forth a detailed examination of pre-merger information sharing in Omnicare v. UnitedHealth Group.
This decision provides an analytical framework for evaluating the reliability and relevance of information exchanges offered as evidence of illegal collusion. It also provides counsel advising companies in competitor collaborations an early warning system for potential gun-jumping violations.
Listen as our authoritative panel of antitrust attorneys examines information-sharing traps, guidance offered by federal agency actions, and recent court decisions such as Omnicare. The panel will outline best practices for competitor businesses to avoid violating antitrust laws and regulations.
Outline
- History and court treatment of gun-jumping
- Historical look at gun-jumping and court treatment
- Omnicare v. UnitedHealth Group (N.D. Ill. Jan. 16, 2009)
- Lessons learned from recent enforcement actions
- Premature control
- Information sharing traps for the unwary
- During due diligence and transition planning
- Joint marketing
- Transaction documentation
- Meetings of executives
- Best practices
Benefits
The panel will review these and other key questions:
- What are the key activities that merging parties and competitive collaborators should avoid?
- What guidance does the Northern District of Illinois' decision provide for competitor ventures?
- What safeguards should companies implement to prevent sharing information that will violate antitrust law?
Faculty
Robert Schlossberg,
Partner
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Washington, D.C.
He represents clients on antitrust matters with a particular emphasis on practice before the FTC and the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department. He has considerable experience with antitrust issues in mergers and acquisitions and has guided scores of national and international transactions through antitrust review to a successful conclusion.
Corey W. Roush,
Partner
Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D.C.
He focuses on antitrust and consumer protection litigation, white collar criminal defense, corporate governance and internal investigations, and other complex commercial litigation. He works with clients on issues pertaining to mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, health care, the defense industry, and intellectual property.
Timothy J. Cornell,
Counsel
Clifford Chance, Washington, D.C.
He advises clients on antitrust issues in government civil and criminal investigations, regulatory review of mergers and acquisitions, joint venture formation, intellectual property and technology licensing, supply and distribution agreements, retail pricing issues, horizontal and vertical restraints and private party civil litigation.
Ordering
Online CLE - Audio Recording
Includes audio streaming of full program plus handouts (available 24 hours after live seminar).
CLE:
Pre-approved for participatory or non-traditional/alternate format credit in: CA, HI*, NY*, WV*.
Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, MO, MT, TX, VT, WA.
Upon request, also available in: CO, CT*, FL, GA, ID, KY, LA, ME, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR*, SC, TN, UT, WI*, WY. If you are applying for credit in one of these states, make sure to select those states when placing your order.
(*Indicates that Strafford must report attendance.)
Online CLE Audio $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event
Recorded Event
Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live seminar).
CLE: Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, CA, CT, HI, MO, MT, NY, TX, VT, WA, WV. Upon request, self-study credit is also available in: CO, FL, GA, ID, KY, ME, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR, UT, WI, WY. If you are applying for self-study credit in one of these states, contact Strafford CLE at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.
MP3 Download (Audio Only) $297.00
Available 24 hours after the live event
Webinar Download (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00
Available three business days after the live event
CD (Audio Only) $297.00
plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event
DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $297.00
plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event
Webinar/Teleconference
Strafford webinars/teleconferences offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program). Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.
CLE Credit
Strafford's live seminars qualify for CLE in every state that accredits webinars. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.
Customer Reviews
Presentations were excellent. I especially benefited from the question and answer session, as the speakers addressed actual situations that affect many of us.
Angelica Toro
Popular
Great program. All three speakers were very knowledgeable and had smooth deliveries.
John Bowers
Fortune 100 Company
I was impressed with the examples and the practical applications of the concepts.
Connie Sue Martin
Bullivant Houser Bailey
A thoroughly professionally structured and presented program.
Roy Gowey
City of Coeur d'Alene
The three presentations created a balanced approach.
Cris Navarro
Enloe Medical Center
Antitrust Law Advisory Board
Partner
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom
Partner
Fenwick & West
Shareholder
Greenberg Traurig
Partner
Foley & Lardner
Partner
Mayer Brown
Shareholder
Briggs and Morgan
Partner
Hogan Lovells
Partner
Jones Day
Partner
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
Partner
Kaye Scholer
Partner
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher