Fairness Opinions Under Heightened Scrutiny
Strategies for Fairness Opinion and Engagement Letter Practice in M&A Transactions
Recording of a 90-minute CLE teleconference with Q&A
Conducted on Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Recorded event now available
Description
Fairness opinions issued by investment banks in M&A transactions now face increased judicial and regulatory scrutiny. In February, the Seventh Circuit addressed the potential liability for investment banks issuing fairness opinions in what many call the most instructive court decision in years.
The Seventh Circuit ruling provides new case law on the duty to update or withdraw fairness opinions, particularly when market conditions change between the time of the opinion and the closing of the deal. The precedential impact of the case remains to be seen.
Nonetheless, the case highlights the significance of the engagement letter in M&A transactions and whether an investment bank should rely on management projections lacking independent verification when issuing fairness opinions.
Listen as our panel of attorneys — including an M&A transactional attorney, counsel for an investment bank, and an M&A litigator — reviews the recent case law and regulatory activity regarding fairness opinions and offers best practices for issuers and recipients of fairness opinions and related engagement letters.
Outline
- Recent litigation, regulatory and shareholder activity
- HA 2003 Liquidating Trust v. Credit Suisse Securities LLC (7th Cir. 2008): its scope and precedential impact
- FINRA Rule 2290(a)
- Current state of the law regarding fairness opinions
- Smith v. Van Gorkom
- Toys-R-Us
- In re Topps Shareholders Litigation
- Best practices for fairness opinions and engagement letters
- Engagement letters
- Data used to support opinion: reliance, diligence and investigative duties
- Second opinions: necessary or useful?
- Recent disclosure issues related to fairness opinions
Benefits
The panel will review these and other key questions:
- How does the recent Seventh Circuit opinion, HA 2003 Liquidating Trust v. Credit Suisse Securities LLC, change the landscape for fairness opinion practice?
- What are some strategies for drafting and negotiating the engagement letter to protect your client's interests and minimize liability if a deal goes wrong?
- What are some best practices for issuers and recipients of fairness opinions to minimize legal risks?
Faculty
Charles H. Baker,
Partner
Paul Hastings, New York
He focuses on all aspects of mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance matters. He has specific experience representing investment banks in establishing and providing fairness opinion services.
D. Casey Kobi,
Vice President, IBD Legal
Lehman Brothers, New York
He covers mergers and acquisitions, equity and debt capital markets, leveraged finance and principal transactions and advises the firm’s Commitment Committee and Fairness Opinion Committee.
Kevin C. Logue,
Partner
Paul Hastings, New York
He focuses on mergers and acquisitions and financial services litigation. He litigates disputes involving pre- and post-merger disputes and has defended numerous merger fairness challenges.
Ordering
Recorded Event
Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live seminar).
CLE: Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, CA, CT, HI, MO, MT, NY, TX, VT, WA, WV. Upon request, self-study credit is also available in: CO, FL, GA, ID, KY, ME, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR, UT, WI, WY. If you are applying for self-study credit in one of these states, contact Strafford CLE at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.
CD $49.00
plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event
CLE Credit
Strafford's live seminars qualify for CLE in every state that accredits webinars. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.
Customer Reviews
The speakers were tops in their industry.
Peter Danias
Kaye Scholer
Very informative — one of the best run programs in a plethora of on-line offerings.
Jeff Michelman
Stinson Morrison Hecker
The teleconference contained information that was relevant, useful and up-to-date.
Mark Hegedus
Spiegel & McDiarmid
This was an excellent teleconference; one of the best I have listened to. The speakers were all very knowledgeable on the subject, but importantly, they were able to present in a very direct, easy to listen to and understand style.
Jose E Guzman, Jr.
Nossaman
I liked everything about the teleconference - knowledgeable speakers, well presented, timely topic. I was very impressed.
James A. Tramonte
Miller Martin
Finance Law Advisory Board
Partner
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
Partner
Nixon Peabody
Partner
Alston & Bird
Counsel
Mayer Brown
Partner
O’Melveny & Myers
Our Guarantee
Strafford webinars and teleconferences are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10.