Electronically Stored Information Preservation and Collection: Zubulake Revisited

New Requirements for Effective Litigation Holds

Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar/teleconference with Q&A


Conducted on Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Recorded event now available


This CLE webinar will detail the implications of the Pension Committee decision for business counsel, explain the opinion's analytical framework for preserving electronically stored information (ESI) and assessing culpable conduct, and offer best practices for using litigation holds and preserving ESI.

Description

A highly-anticipated recent decision, Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities provides companies and counsel with meaningful guidance for evaluating whether steps taken to preserve evidence are reasonable.

In the decision, Judge Shira Scheindlin warned, “it should be abundantly clear that the duty to preserve means what it says and that a failure to preserve records—paper or electronic—and to search in the right places for those records, will inevitably result in the spoliation of evidence.”

The compliance challenges companies now face are far-reaching. The new preservation requirements will impact strategic, technological and human resources companywide. Companies and counsel must fully understand the expanded e-discovery case law in order to ensure compliance.

Listen as our authoritative panel of litigators examines the Pension Committee decision and its implications, explains the analytical framework for preservation of ESI and assessing culpable conduct, and offers best practices for litigation holds and preservation of ESI.

Outline

  1. Duty to preserve and managing preservation
    1. Triggering event
    2. Defendants v. plaintiffs
    3. Scope of preservation
    4. Ongoing obligations
  2. Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2010) and its implications
    1. Requirements for findings levels of culpability for spoliation
    2. Remedy for spoliation
  3. Best practices for litigation holds
    1. Litigation hold checklist
    2. Possible use of technology
    3. Managing ongoing preservation obligations

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key questions:

  • What guidance does the Pension Committee decision provide for analyzing spoliation claims?
  • What are the first steps parties must take upon notice of a litigation hold?
  • What time and cost-saving measures can companies and counsel employ to properly preserve electronic information?

Faculty

Michael E. Lackey, Jr., Partner
Mayer Brown, Washington, D.C.

He focuses on civil and criminal litigation and electronic discovery. He handles multi-district and class action litigation, government contract disputes, and appeals. He is nationally recognized for his knowledge of electronic discovery issues and is a member of the Board of Advisors to the Georgetown University Law School Advanced E-Discovery Institute.

Jeffrey Fowler, Counsel
O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles

He leads the firm's Document Production Task Force and is a member of the Document Retention and e-Discovery Practice. He is responsible for the firm's standard protocols for e-discovery and advises clients on litigation preparedness and document retention and destruction policies.

Robert B. (Barry) Wiggins, Director, Forensic & Dispute Services
Deloitte Financial Advisory Services, Washington, D.C.

He consults with legal counsel and their clients on a variety of e-discovery issues and in regard to all phases of e-discovery compliance, including the preservation, collection, processing, review, and production of discovery materials in civil and criminal matters and investigations.

Ordering

Online CLE

Includes audio streaming of full program plus handouts (available 24 hours after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for participatory or non-traditional/alternate format credit in: CA, HI*, NY*, WV*. Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, MO, MT, OR*, TX, UT, VT, WA.
Upon request, also available in: CO, CT*, FL, GA, ID, KY, LA, ME, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, SC, TN, WI*, WY. If you are applying for credit in one of these states, make sure to select those states when placing your order.
(*Indicates that Strafford must report attendance.)

Online CLE Audio $123.50
Available 24 hours after the live event

Includes 50% off with Special Offer

How does this work?


Recorded Event

Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live seminar).

CLE: Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, CA, CT, HI, MO, MT, NY, OR, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV. Upon request, self-study credit is also available in: CO, FL, GA, ID, KY, ME, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, WI, WY. If you are applying for self-study credit in one of these states, contact Strafford CLE at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.

MP3 Download (Audio with Slide PDFs) $123.50
Available 24 hours after the live event

Includes 50% off with Special Offer

How does this work?

Webinar Download (Slide Presentation with Audio) $123.50
Available three business days after the live event

Includes 50% off with Special Offer

How does this work?

CD (Audio with Slide PDFs) $123.50 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

Includes 50% off with Special Offer

DVD (Slide Presentation with Audio) $123.50 plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event

Includes 50% off with Special Offer

Webinar/Teleconference

Strafford webinars/teleconferences offer several options for participation: online viewing of speaker-controlled PowerPoint presentations with audio via computer speakers or via phone; or audio only via telephone (download speaker handouts prior to the program).  Please note that our webinars do not feature videos of the presenters.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

Program Materials

Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Download Acrobat FREE.

CLE Credit

Strafford's live seminars qualify for CLE in every state that accredits webinars. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.

More Details>

Customer Reviews

This was my first experience with an interactive CLE.  It was good not to have to leave my office for the program.

Patricia Hays

Vestcom International

I found the content very useful and was impressed by the high quality of each speaker's ability to articulate his presentation.

Andrew Lillie

Hogan & Hartson

The webinar provided good practical advice.

Peter Bado

Thrivent Financial

The program provided good legal references, good bullet points and good scope.

Tim Thomas

Kolesar & Leatham

The speakers were well versed and kept my attention throughout the program.

Natalie Kossak

Independent Fiduciary Services

Litigation Advisory Board

David R. Cohen

Partner

K&L Gates

Jeffrey J. Fowler

Counsel

O’Melveny & Myers

Jonathan Evan Goldberg

Partner

Seyfarth Shaw

Dean D. Hunt

Partner

Baker & Hostetler

Michael E. Lackey, Jr.

Partner

Mayer Brown

Marie A. Lona

Partner

Winston & Strawn

Anthony T. Pierce

Partner

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld

Robert B. (Barry) Wiggins

Of Counsel

Deloitte Financial Advisory Services