Class Action Arbitration Waivers Under Attack
Drafting and Defending Employment and Consumer Arbitration Waivers
Recording of a 90-minute CLE teleconference with Q&A
Conducted on Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Recorded event now available
This seminar will look at the recent trends against enforceability of class action waivers, discuss strategies for drafting arbitration provisions and class action waivers to maximize enforceability, provide best practices for defending waivers in litigation and discuss limited class action arbitration alternatives.
Description
One of the most contentious issues in consumer and employment class action litigation has been the enforceability of class action waiver provisions in mandatory arbitration clauses. Several recent court decisions have struck down wavers and a true split among the circuits is arising.
The Second and Third Circuit Courts of Appeal recently invalidated class action arbitration waivers in consumer contracts. Two recent California state appellate courts have invalidated the waivers in employment contracts.
Counsel must carefully draft arbitration provisions and waivers of class action arbitration to maximize enforceability. Given the courts' increasing hostility to these waivers, companies must now consider engaging in limited class arbitration with arbitral procedures tailored to the proceedings.
Listen as our authoritative panel of attorneys discusses recent trends against enforceability of class action waivers, drafting techniques to maximize enforceability, tips for defending waivers in litigation, and limited class action arbitration alternatives.
Outline
- Recent Court Rulings and Statutory Developments
- Homa v. American Express Company (3rd Cir. 2009)
- In re American Express Merchants Litigation (2nd Cir. 2009)
- Chalk v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (9th Cir. 2009)
- Franco v. Athens Disposal Co., (Cal. App. 2009)
- Sanchez v. Western Pizza Enterprises, Inc. (Cal. App. 2009)
- Laster v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (cert. den. Sup. Ct. 2008)
- Statutory developments
- Strategies for Drafting Class Action Arbitration Waivers
- Principle of bilaterality or fairness
- Cost of arbitration
- Location of arbitration
- Choice-of-law clause
- Right of prevailing consumer or employee to recover counsel fees
- Contractual fee-shifting clause
- Limited class action arbitration alternatives
- Stolt-Nielsen SA v. AnimalFeeds Int’l. Corp. (cert. granted Sup. Ct. 2009)
- Best Practices for Enforcing Class Action Waivers in Court
- Reliance on case law enforcing waivers
- Class actions are just procedural devices
- Fee-shifting statutes
- Determining unconscionability at time of contracting, not when lawsuit filed
- FAA preemption arguments
Benefits
The panel will review these and other key questions:
- What are the lessons from In re American Express Merchant's Litig. (2nd Circuit) and Homa v. American Express Co. (3rd Circuit) for creating class action waiver clauses?
- What are the best practices for drafting arbitration clauses to maximize enforceability?
- What are the most effective defense strategies when a class action waiver agreement is challenged?
- When should companies consider limited class action arbitration?
- How can businesses act to preserve judicial involvement in class certification?
Faculty
Bryan A. Fratkin,
Partner
McGuireWoods, Richmond, Va.
His practice focuses on business litigation, with an emphasis on consumer financial services, securities, and antitrust litigation. He represents clients involved in disputes that include allegations of fraud, conspiracy, civil RICO, and breach of contract. In several cases brought as purported class actions, he has prevailed on motions requiring arbitration on an individual, non-class, basis.
Archis A. Parasharami,
Partner
Mayer Brown, Washington, D.C.
He has experience litigating the enforceability of arbitration agreements, with a particular emphasis on consumer contracts. He has advised businesses on drafting arbitration clauses in a wide variety of settings and has co-authored a number of articles on arbitration. He also handles employment matters, and has authored amicus briefs for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and for a number of businesses.
Michael Mallow,
Partner
Loeb & Loeb, Los Angeles
He is a trial lawyer representing clients in major litigation in a wide variety of areas including entertainment, unfair competition, business torts and intellectual property, as well as defending consumer protection cases brought by governmental agencies and class action and representative plaintiffs.
Ordering
Online CLE - Audio Recording
Includes audio streaming of full program plus handouts (available 24 hours after live seminar).
CLE:
Pre-approved for participatory or non-traditional/alternate format credit in: CA, HI*, NY*, WV*.
Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, MO, MT, TX, VT, WA.
Upon request, also available in: CO, CT*, FL, GA, ID, KY, LA*, ME, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR*, SC, TN, UT, WI*, WY. If you are applying for credit in one of these states, make sure to select those states when placing your order.
(*Indicates that Strafford must report attendance.)
Online CLE Audio $149.00
Available 24 hours after the live event
Recorded Event
Includes full event recording plus handouts (available after live seminar).
CLE: Pre-approved for self-study credit in: AK, AZ, CA, CT, HI, MO, MT, NY, TX, VT, WA, WV. Upon request, self-study credit is also available in: CO, FL, GA, ID, KY, ME, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, OR, UT, WI, WY. If you are applying for self-study credit in one of these states, contact Strafford CLE at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35 or CLE@straffordpub.com.
MP3 Download (Audio Only) $49.00
Available 24 hours after the live event
CD $49.00
plus $9.45 S&H
Available ten business days after the live event
CLE Credit
Strafford's live seminars qualify for CLE in every state that accredits webinars. They offer you a high quality, cost effective, and convenient CLE option, with no lost travel time or expenses.
Customer Reviews
Speakers were knowledgeable enough to talk about the subject matter in an easily digestible manner.
Daniel M. Cleary
Gotham Insurance/New York Marine & General Insurance
The program was very to the point — no fluff.
Brian McNamara
Wright Lindsey & Jennings
The speaker's practical discussions were particularly helpful.
Kenneth J. Clarkson
Sullivan, Ward, Asher & Patton
The presentation and handouts were very informative. And it allowed me to attend a CLE without leaving the office.
Bill Pemerton
Horton Maddox & Anderson
Strafford’s webinars are consistently of higher quality than most other webinars.
James L. Burns
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
Class Action Law Advisory Board
Partner
Reed Smith
Partner
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro
Partner
O'Melveny & Myers
Partner
Alston & Bird
Partner
Goldman Scarlato & Karon
Partner
Weinstein Kitchenoff & Asher
Partner
Winston & Strawn
Partner
Edwards Wildman Palmer
Partner
King & Spalding
Professor
Harvard Law School
Our Guarantee
Strafford webinars and teleconferences are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. For more information regarding complaints and refunds, please contact us at 1-800-926-7926 ext 10.